Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research

Print ISSN: 2394-2746

Online ISSN: 2394-2754

CODEN : IJOGCS

Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research (IJOGR) open access, peer-reviewed quarterly journal publishing since 2014 and is published under auspices of the Innovative Education and Scientific Research Foundation (IESRF), aim to uplift researchers, scholars, academicians, and professionals in all academic and scientific disciplines. IESRF is dedicated to the transfer of technology and research by publishing scientific journals, research content, providing professional’s membership, and conducting conferences, seminars, and award more...

Article type

Original Article


Article page

347- 351


Authors Details

Kantamani Pavithra, Kanaparthy Priyadarshini, Y Annapoorna*


Article Metrics


View Article As

 


Downlaod Files

   






Article statistics

Viewed: 449

PDF Downloaded: 861


Estimation of fetal weight by clinical method and its comparison with ultrasonography and its correlation with actual birth weight in term singleton pregnancy


Original Article

Author Details : Kantamani Pavithra, Kanaparthy Priyadarshini, Y Annapoorna*

Volume : 9, Issue : 3, Year : 2022

Article Page : 347-351

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijogr.2022.066



Suggest article by email

Get Permission

Abstract

Background: Not just in the management of labour and delivery, but also in the treatment of high-risk pregnancies and growth tracking, fetal weight assessment is important.
Objective: This study is to determine which method of fetal weight estimation is more accurate which helps inappropriate decision making as ultrasound is not readily available in case of emergencies and also it is an additional burden on sonologist during emergencies.
Materials and Methods: This prospective comparative study was carried out at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department and Radio-diagnosis of GSL Medical College from September 2020 to February 2021.
These clinical and ultrasonographic fetal weights are compared with actual weights.
Results: 2 patients delivered babies with actual birth weights in the range of 1.5-2 kg, 13 patients g between 2.1 and 2.5 kg, 29 patients between 2.6-3.0 kg, 21 patients between 3.1 and 3.5 kg and 5 patients between 3.6 and 4.0.kg.
Hadlock's and Dare's equations anticipated mean birth weights of 2.90 and 3.07 kg, respectively.
Studies indicated that ultrasonographically estimated fetal weight is no better than the clinical for predicting fetal weight. Clnical estimates appear to be as accurate as ultrasonographic estimates where ultrasound is not available.
 

Keywords: Estimated fetal weight.


How to cite : Pavithra K, Priyadarshini K, Annapoorna Y, Estimation of fetal weight by clinical method and its comparison with ultrasonography and its correlation with actual birth weight in term singleton pregnancy. Indian J Obstet Gynecol Res 2022;9(3):347-351

This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.