Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research

Print ISSN: 2394-2746

Online ISSN: 2394-2754

CODEN : IJOGCS

Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research (IJOGR) open access, peer-reviewed quarterly journal publishing since 2014 and is published under auspices of the Innovative Education and Scientific Research Foundation (IESRF), aim to uplift researchers, scholars, academicians, and professionals in all academic and scientific disciplines. IESRF is dedicated to the transfer of technology and research by publishing scientific journals, research content, providing professional’s membership, and conducting conferences, seminars, and award more...

Article type

Original Article


Article page

389- 391


Authors Details

P. Thulasi, Balakrishnan R, Shanthi M


View Article As

 


Downlaod Files

   






Article statistics

Viewed: 1342

PDF Downloaded: 822


Comparative study of oral versus vaginal misoprostol 25 mcg for induction of labour at term in a Medical College Hospital in South India – Prospective Study


Original Article

Author Details : P. Thulasi, Balakrishnan R, Shanthi M

Volume : 4, Issue : 4, Year : 2017

Article Page : 389-391


Suggest article by email

Get Permission

Abstract

Objective of the study is to compare the safety and efficacy of oral versus vaginal misoprostol 25mcg for induction of labour at term and to assess perinatal out come.
Materials and Method: Study was conducted in the department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (OBG) at P K Das Institute of Medical Sciences, Vaniamkulam. It was a one year study. It is a comparative prospective study on 300 patients admitted at term for safe confinement. The patients were divided into 2 groups – 150 in each – 25 mcg oral misoprostol / 25mcg vaginal.
Results: There is no statistically significant association between parity and route of administration of drug. There is statistically significant association between Premature Rupture of Membranes (PROM) and route of administration of drug.
In oral group- 66.6 % had Induction Delivery interval between 8-12 hrs and in vaginal group – 68% had Induction Delivery interval between 8-12hrs.
In oral group - 100 % had 2 repeat doses. In vaginal group - 90% had 2 repeat doses.
In oral group, 80% had normal delivery. Only 6.66% had LSCS.
In vaginal group, 73.33% had normal delivery. 13.33% had LSCS.
In oral group, 96.66% had no NICU admission. In vaginal group, 97.33% had no NICU admission.
Among the oral group of those patients who had atonic Post Partum Hemorrhage (PPH), three required blood transfusions.
Conclusion: In our study, oral misoprostol 25mcg is as effective as vaginal misoprostol 25mcg for induction of labour at term with minimal maternal and fetal complications.


Keywords: Induction of labour, Misoprostol, Maternal complication, Fetal complication.

 


How to cite : Thulasi P, Balakrishnan R, Shanthi M, Comparative study of oral versus vaginal misoprostol 25 mcg for induction of labour at term in a Medical College Hospital in South India – Prospective Study. Indian J Obstet Gynecol Res 2017;4(4):389-391

This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.