Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research

Print ISSN: 2394-2746

Online ISSN: 2394-2754

CODEN : IJOGCS

Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research (IJOGR) open access, peer-reviewed quarterly journal publishing since 2014 and is published under auspices of the Innovative Education and Scientific Research Foundation (IESRF), aim to uplift researchers, scholars, academicians, and professionals in all academic and scientific disciplines. IESRF is dedicated to the transfer of technology and research by publishing scientific journals, research content, providing professional’s membership, and conducting conferences, seminars, and award more...

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article statistics

Viewed: 818

PDF Downloaded: 681


Get Permission Karadkhele, Puppalwar, Pandya, and Jain: Knowledge, awareness, approach and management of vulvo-vaginal infections with topical combination preparations: A cross-sectional, questionnaire based gynaecologists survey


Introduction

Vulvo-vaginal infection (VVI) is symptomatic vaginitis (inflammation of the vagina and vulva) most often caused by bacterial vaginosis, candidiasis and trichomoniasis.1, 2 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported that around 75% of women are susceptible for at least one episode of VVC and 40%–45% will have two or more episodes.3 The symptoms include soreness, pain during urination, itching and abnormal vaginal discharge.4 Although most infections are mild in nature, some women can develop severe infections involving redness, swelling and crack in mucosal wall of the vagina. It was reported that about 20% of women normally have Candida in their vagina without having any symptoms.5 According to a research conducted in urban population in India, candida accounted for 30% of vulvovaginal infections in reproductive age females while bacterial vaginosis was also quite prevalent at 17.3%.6 Another study by Aubyn et al. (2013) reported prevalence of bacterial vaginosis 28%, Candida infection 22% and co-infection of bacterial and candida 16%. A review of studies found that 20-30% of women with bacterial vaginosis are co-infected with Candida species while 60-80% of cases with bacterial vaginosis are co-infected with T. vaginalis. In such cases, therapeutic eradication of the dominant pathogen can lead to the sequential emergence of the second pathogen.7

Both oral and local therapies (antibacterial, antibiotic and antifungal agents) are available for the management of VVI. The main goal of VVI treatment is to get relief from symptoms and prevent the recurrence of infection. Topical combination preparations containing antibiotics, antifungals and steroids are available in India and are used in gynaecological practice in management of VVI. One such topical preparation is nadifloxacin, terbinafine and mometasone combination. Nadifloxacin, a topical fluoroquinolone antibiotic, is effective against both aerobic gram positive and gram negative, anaerobic bacteria and is well tolerated for the treatment of patients with bacterial skin infections.8 Terbinafine, is an allylamine antifungal agent that is safe and effective for the treatment of superficial and mycotic infections.9 Mometasone is a medium potency topical steroid.10

In India, data on use of such triple drug topical combination in management of VVI and gynaecologists’ approach for such preparations is limited. Hence, the present questionnaire-based survey was conducted to assess approach of gynaecologists’ for management of VVI and their perception towards use of topical combination preparations.

Materials and Methods

Study design

This was a cross-sectional, non-interventional, observational, questionnaire based survey conducted from August 28 to October 16, 2019. Gynaecologists from different regions of India who were willing to provide responses to the questionnaire were included in this survey (west: Mumbai, Pune, Ahmedabad, Jaipur; north: Delhi, Chandigarh, Lucknow; south: Chennai, Bangalore, Trivandrum; East: Kolkata, Guwahati, Patna; central: Indore, Hyderabad, Nagpur). As this survey did not collect any patient data, ethics committee permission was not sought.

Questionnaire

A series of 10 multiple choice questions were prepared to analyse gynaecologists’ opinion on management of VVI. The questionnaire was targeted on cases of VVI, prevalent practices in topical management for VVI patients and the formulation factors affecting the clinical practice protocol. The questions pertained to the information regarding:

  1. Importance of formulation parameters of topical preparations in management of VVI patients

  2. Role and preference of topical corticosteroid, antifungals and antibacterials in management of VVI

The detailed questions are presented in Table 1. The responses for all the questions were collected through an online link provided to the personnel collecting the data from gynaecologists.

Table 1

Structure ofquestionnaire

S.No Question Response
1 How many cases of VVI do you see in your practice? □ 0-5 cases/wk   □ 6-10 cases/wk □11-20 cases/wk □ >20 cases /wk
2 Do you advice culture and sensitivity testing in patients of VVI? □ Always   □ Sometimes    □ Never
3 Do you consider efficacy of topical preparation, which works at acidic pH (Vaginal pH) as an important parameter while treating VVI? □ Very important   □ important     □ Not important
4 Do you feel pH of the topical preparation, should be considered as an important parameter while treating VVI? □ Very important   □ Important     □ Not important
5 Do you feel broad spectrum activity of nadifloxacin against Gram +ve, Gram –ve aerobes and anaerobes is an important feature while using it in suspected bacterial VVI? □ Very important   □ Important    □ Not important
6 Do you prefer fungicidal allylamines (terbinafine) instead of fungistatic azoles (clotrimazole/miconazole) in suspected fungal VVI? □ Yes       □ No
7 For how long generally do your VVI patients require the topical management? □ 1 wk   □ 2wks     □ 3wks    □ ≥4 wks
8 Do you prefer using a lower potency steroid (mometasone) compared to higher potency steroid (clobetasol) for application on genital areas? □ Yes       □ No
9 Do you prescribe combination topical preparations of antibiotics, antifungals & steroids in management of VVI? □ Always   □ Frequently     □ Sometimes    □ Never
10 How satisfied are you with the use of topical triple combination of nadifloxacin, terbinafine and mometasone in management of VVI? □ Very satisfied    □ Satisfied    □ Not satisfied

Statistical analysis

No formal sample size calculation was done. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the responses to the questions.

Results

Patient flow in practice

A total of 992 gynaecologists participated in this survey and responded to 10 questions. Majority of the gynaecologists (N=420/992, 42%) in the survey responded that they treat approximately 10 patients with VVI per week. 4% of gynaecologists (N=42/992) treat more than 20 cases per week.

Culture and sensitivity testing

About 69% of the gynaecologists (N=688/992) sometimes advise culture and sensitivity testing in patients with VVI. Overall, 23% of gynaecologists (N=227/992) always advise culture and sensitivity testing as shown in Figure 1, Figure 2.

Consideration of various parameters while prescribing

Around 54% of gynaecologists (N=532/992) consider efficacy of topical preparations which can work at acidic pH (vaginal pH) as an important parameter while treating patients with VVI whereas 44% of gynaecologists (N=436/992) consider it as a very important parameter (Figure 3). Likewise, pH of the topical preparation was also considered as an important parameter by 53% of gynaecologists (N=529/992) while 3% of gynaecologists (N=28/992) gave no importance to pH of topical preparations. According to 53% of gynaecologists (N=521/992) patients with VVI generally require topical management for a period of two weeks but 22% of gynaecologists (N=224/992) consider one week of prescription. About 42% (N=413/992) of gynaecologists responded that they frequently prescribe combination topical preparations in the management of VVI and 30.5% (N=306/992) sometimes prescribe as shown in Figure 4.

Nearly, 48% of gynaecologists believed (N=478/992) that broad spectrum activity of nadifloxacin against Gram positive, Gram negative aerobes and anaerobes is a very important feature while using it in management of suspected bacterial VVI (Figure 5).

Overall, 82.5% of gynaecologists (N=818/992) preferred using a lower potency steroid like mometasone for application on delicate genital areas instead of higher potency steroid like clobetasol. About 88% of gynaecologists (N=872/992) preferred fungicidal allylamines (terbinafine) instead of fungistatic azoles (clotrimazole/miconazole) in suspected fungal VVI while 12% of gynaecologists (N=120/992) do not prefer fungicidal allylamines (Figure 6).

Satisfaction about combination topical preparation-

About 98% of gynaecologists were satisfied (67%; N=664/992) to very satisfied (31%; N=312/992) with the use of triple drug topical combination of nadifloxacin, terbinafine and mometasone in the management of VVI. Overall, in this survey more than 99% of gynaecologists were satisfied with the use of triple drug combination for management of VVI (Figure 5).

Figure 1

Gynaecologists’ response for number of cases of VVI seen in their clinical practice

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-media-server/7aaff849-f724-48ef-a820-f8a69c428c45image1.png
Figure 2

Gynaecologists’ response on screening tests in patients with VVI

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-media-server/7aaff849-f724-48ef-a820-f8a69c428c45image2.png
Figure 3

Gynaecologists’ response for pH of topical preparation and pH of topical preparation

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-media-server/7aaff849-f724-48ef-a820-f8a69c428c45image3.png
Figure 4

Gynaecologists’ response for topical combination of nadifloxacin, terbinafine and mometasone and duration of treatment

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-media-server/7aaff849-f724-48ef-a820-f8a69c428c45image4.png
Figure 5

Gynaecologists’ response on use of triple drug topical combination of nadifloxacin, terbinafine and mometasone and nadifloxacin and antimicrobial coverage of nadifloxacin

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-media-server/7aaff849-f724-48ef-a820-f8a69c428c45image5.png
Figure 6

Gynaecologists’ response on preference of steroids and allylamines antifungal

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-media-server/7aaff849-f724-48ef-a820-f8a69c428c45image6.png

Discussion

This survey reported that VVI is common in India with 42% of gynaecologists observing 6 to 10 cases of VVI per week. 54% of gynaecologists considered efficacy of topical preparations which can work at acidic pH (vaginal pH) as an important parameter while deciding the management of VVI. Around 41% of gynaecologists frequently prescribed combination topical preparations for the management of VVI. Nearly half of the gynaecologists reported of recommending topical preparations for a period of two weeks in VVI patients. Overall, 99% of the gynaecologists were either very satisfied or satisfied with the results of triple drug topical combination of nadifloxacin, terbinafine and mometasone.

Microbial composition of the vagina varies with the vaginal pH. It was evident that Candida species appears more frequently at pH 4 and other infectious micro flora appears at higher vaginal pH.11, 12 In India, VVI is mainly caused by Candida albicans, Candida tropicalis, Candida glabrata and Gardnerella vaginalis which grows at acidic pH. 13, 14, 15 Vaginal pH should be frequently checked for early diagnosis of VVI.16 Topical preparations which are able to work at vaginal pH are recommended for VVI.17 Accordingly, around 98% of gynaecologists in the current analysis considered efficacy of topical preparations which can work at acidic pH (vaginal pH) as an important parameter while treating patients with VVI.

Although topical azoles are preferred for management of VVI, but they may require a longer course of therapy.18 Nevertheless, there is a need for topical preparation which shows its effect within a shorter period of time.

A topical combination preparation of nadifloxacin (antibacterial), terbinafine (antifungal, antibacterial) and mometasone furoate (steroid) is available in the market and is used in the management of VVI by gynaecologists in India. Nadifloxacin, a topical fluoroquinolone antibiotic has anti-bacterial and anti-inflammatory properties. It acts by down-modulating the cutaneous immunity and interferes with the antigen-presenting ability of the epidermal cells.19 Nadifloxacin inhibits IL-12 and IFN-γ production to activate T cells and keratinocytes which results in reduction of bacterial infections.20 Nadifloxacin is able to reduce a significant number of micro flora and is effective and safe in the management of bacterial skin infections.21, 22 Our survey also indicated that overall 98% of gynaecologists opined that broad spectrum antibacterial activity of nadifloxacin is a very important or an important feature while using it in the treatment of suspected bacterial VVI.

Topical mometasone furoate, is a unique steroid and has demonstrated a higher degree of efficacy as well as local and systemic safety.23, 24 A study reported that topical mometasone furoate has higher safety and efficacy for management of vulvar lichen sclerosus as compared to clobetasol propionate.25 We observed that for application on delicate areas like genital area, a lower potency steroid (mometasone) was a preferred choice by 82% of gynaecologists than a higher potency steroid (clobetasol). Higher potency steroids are sensitive and cause burning sensation on thin areas of skin.

Our survey also indicated that gynaecologists prefer terbinafine being an allylamine antifungal agent for management of VVI. Antifungal agents exert their effect by changing the permeability of fungal cell membrane;26 Terbinafine, an allylamine antifungal agent, inhibits the ergosterol synthesis in fungi and thus destroy the integrity of fungal cell membrane and this depends on the concentration.27 Further, terbinafine has the ability to manage VVI within two weeks and is considered superior than other azoles such as itraconazole, clotrimazole and fluconazole.28, 29 But terbinafine fungicidal activity is active against few Candida like parapsiosis and static against C albicans and others and few other candida species. A previously published study suggest that fungicidal activity of terbinafine is rapid when compared to itraconazole and the minimal fungicidal concentration(MFC) to minimal inhibitory concentration(MIC) ratio for terbinafine is lower than itraconazole; fungicidal activity of terbinafine was excellent and initiated rapidly (by 7 hours) as compared to itraconazole.30

Mild vaginal infections usually respond to a single dose or short duration of treatment, i.e, 1–3 days, whereas more severe signs and symptoms need topical therapy for 5–7 days.31 In the present survey, around half of the gynaecologists were found recommending triple drug topical preparations for a period of two weeks while 22% recommending it for a week in the management of VVI.

Triple drug topical therapy like combination of nadifloxacin, terbinafine and mometasone, is found to be well-supported by the gynaecologists in our survey probably because of its broad spectrum effect in management and control of symptoms in VVI patients. A combination of antibacterial, antifungal and steroid components of triple drug topical preparation can provide early onset of relief from VVI. Hence, a triple drug topical preparation offers a potential for therapeutic benefit in the form of short duration of application required due to early resolution of symptoms and control over microbial infection while going for empirical treatment in VVI.

Our survey highlights about gynaecologists’ perspective on management of VVI and the use of combination topical preparation in it. However it had some limitations including the cross-sectional design which makes us unable to analyse behaviour over a period of time and does not help to determine the cause and effect relationship.

Conclusion

This survey indicated that triple drug topical combination of nadifloxacin, terbinafine and mometasone is commonly used by gynaecologists in the management of VVI with satisfactory results.

Limitation of the study- Due to cross-sectional design of this study we failed to analyse the behaviour over a period of time. You can add any related limitation of the study example like we have not assessed severity of VVI as it is overall opinion of gynaecologists and as per severity, duration of treatment can change.

Acknowledgement

The authors would sincerely like to appreciate the efforts of gynaecologists for providing their expertise in answering the survey questionnaire. We would also like to acknowledge Knowledge Isotopes Pvt. Ltd. (http:// www.knowledgeisotopes.com) for the medical writing assistance.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1 

Jane Mashburn Vaginal infections updateJ Midwifery Women's Health201257629341526-9523Wiley

2 

R Elgantri A Mohamed F Ibrahim Diagnosis of Bacterial Vaginosis by Amsel Criteria and Gram Stain MethodSebha Med J201091207

3 

Centers of Disease Control and Preventionhttps://www.cdc.gov/std/tg2015/candidiasis.htm

4 

Esther Hong Shreya Dixit Paul L. Fidel Jennifer Bradford Gayle Fischer Vulvovaginal Candidiasis as a Chronic DiseaseJ Lower Genital Tract Dis20141813181089-2591Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

5 

J D Sobel Vulvovaginal candidosisLancet20073699577196171

6 

A Narayankhedkar A Hodiwala A Mane Clinicoetiological characterization of infectious vaginitis amongst women of reproductive age group from Navi Mumbai, IndiaJ Sex Transm Dis2015201581709210.1155/2015/817092

7 

Jack D. Sobel Chitra Subramanian Betsy Foxman Marilyn Fairfax Scott E. Gygax Mixed Vaginitis—More Than Coinfection and With Therapeutic ImplicationsCurr Infect Dis Rep201315210481523-3847, 1534-3146Springer Science and Business Media LLC

8 

Varsha Narayanan Salman Motlekar Ganesh Kadhe Seema Bhagat Efficacy and Safety of Nadifloxacin for Bacterial Skin Infections: Results from Clinical and Post-Marketing StudiesDermatol Ther201442233482193-8210, 2190-9172Springer Science and Business Media LLC

9 

S Krishnan-Natesan Terbinafine: a pharmacological and clinical reviewExpert Opin Pharmacother20091016272333

10 

Jan Faergemann Ole Christensen Peter Sjovall Annika Johnsson Kjell Hersle Peter Nordin An open study of efficacy and safety of long-term treatment with mometasone furoate fatty cream in the treatment of adult patients with atopic dermatitisJ Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol200014539360926-9959, 1468-3083Wiley

11 

A Saturnino H Sisenando A Pereira A Vale L Pires E Ramos vulvovaginitis: Vaginal ph changes and associated microfloraActa Cir Bras2005202669

12 

B L Hainer M V Gibson Vaginitis: Diagnosis and TreatmentAm Fam Physician2011837

13 

N Kalia J Singh S Sharma S S Kamboj H Arora M Kaur Prevalence of vulvovaginal infections and species specific distribution of vulvovaginal candidiasis in married women of north indiaInt J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci2015425366

14 

S D Rathod J D Klausner K Krupp A L Reingold P Madhivanan Epidemiologic features of Vulvovaginal Candidiasis among reproductive-age women in India Infect Dis Obstet Gyneco2012201210.1155/2012/859071

15 

P Bhalla R Chawla S Garg M Singh U Raina Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis among women in Delhi, IndiaIndian J Med Res20071252167

16 

D Gjerdingen P B Fontaine J Santilli J Welsh The impact of regular vaginal pH screening on the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis in pregnancyJ Fam Pract200049139

17 

Dina A. Boikov Jeffrey B. Locke Kenneth D. James Ken Bartizal Jack D. Sobel In vitro activity of the novel echinocandin CD101 at pH 7 and 4 against Candida spp. isolates from patients with vulvovaginal candidiasisJ Antimicrob Chemother2017725135580305-7453, 1460-2091

18 

Julie van Schalkwyk Mark H. Yudin Mark H. Yudin Victoria Allen Celine Bouchard Marc Boucher Vulvovaginitis: Screening for and Management of Trichomoniasis, Vulvovaginal Candidiasis, and Bacterial VaginosisJ Obstet Gynaecol Can2015373266741701-2163Elsevier BV

19 

Koji Murata Kazunari Sugita Miwa Kobayashi Kenji Kabashima Yoshiki Tokura Nadifloxacin downmodulates antigen-presenting functions of epidermal Langerhans cells and keratinocytesJ Dermatol Sci20064229190923-1811Elsevier BV

20 

Keiichi Kuwahara Toshiki Kitazawa Hideki Kitagaki Teruhisa Tsukamoto Mikio Kikuchi Nadifloxacin, an antiacne quinolone antimicrobial, inhibits the production of proinflammatory cytokines by human peripheral blood mononuclear cells and normal human keratinocytesJ Dermatol Sci200538147550923-1811Elsevier BV

21 

G Plewig K T Holland P Nenoff Clinical and bacteriological evaluation of nadifloxacin 1% cream in patients with acne vulgaris: a double-blind, phase III comparison study versus erythromycin 2% creamEur J Dermatol20061614855

22 

P. Nenoff U.-F. Haustein N. Hittel Activity of nadifloxacin (OPC-7251) and seven other antimicrobial agents against aerobic and anaerobic Gram-positive bacteria isolated from bacterial skin infectionsChemother20045041962010009-3157, 1421-9794S. Karger AG

23 

Nitin Mulgaonkar Prabhakar Kulhalli Tejal Chevli Rupal Karnik Manish Sheth Comparative potency of formulations of mometasone furoate in terms of inhibition of ′PIRHR′ in the forearm skin of normal human subjects measured with laser doppler velocimetryIndian J Dermatol, Venereol Leprol20057131700378-6323Medknow

24 

Fabrizio Spada Tanya M Barnes Kerryn A Greive Comparative safety and efficacy of topical mometasone furoate with other topical corticosteroidsAustralas J Dermatol2018593e168740004-8380Wiley

25 

A Cattaneo A M De E Botti L Sonni P Carli G L Taddei Topical mometasone furoate for vulvar lichen sclerosusJ Reprod Med2003484448

26 

F Qin Q Wang C Zhang C Fang L Zhang Efficacy of antifungal drugs in the treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis: A Bayesian network meta-analysisInfect Drug Resist2018111893

27 

J.M. Ollague A.M. de Zurita G. Calero Paracoccidioidomycosis (South American blastomycosis) successfully treated with terbinafine: first case reportBr J Dermatol20001431188910007-0963, 1365-2133Wiley

28 

Ayten Ferahbas Ayse Nedret Koc Umit Uksal Ercan Aygen Selcuk Mistik Sinem Yildiz Terbinafine Versus Itraconazole and Fluconazole in the Treatment of Vulvovaginal CandidiasisAm J Ther200613433261075-2765Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

29 

A Z Mahmoudabadi M Najafyan E Moghimipour M Alwanian Z Seifi Lamisil versus clotrimazole in the treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasisIran J Microbiol20135186

30 

Kevin C. Hazen Fungicidal versus fungistatic activity of terbinafine and itraconazole: An in vitro comparisonJ Am Acad Dermatol1998385S37S410190-9622Elsevier BV

31 

J D Sobel Factors involved in patient choice of oral or vaginal treatment for vulvovaginal candidiasisPatient Prefer Adherence2014831



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Article type

Original Article


Article page

210-215


Authors Details

Archana Karadkhele, Gaurav Puppalwar, Manish R Pandya, Rishi Jain


Article Metrics


View Article As

 


Downlaod Files