- Visibility 179 Views
- Downloads 28 Downloads
- DOI 10.18231/j.ijogr.2021.009
-
CrossMark
- Citation
Seroprevalence of TORCH infection and adverse reproductive outcome in women with bad obstretic history
- Author Details:
-
Shrishti Makhijani *
-
Sharmila S Raut
Introduction
Pregnancy loss is a frustrating and challenging problem for couples and clinicians alike.[1] It is well realized that at least 12-15% of all recognized conceptions end in miscarriage, and pre-clinical pregnancy loss rate is still higher- 22-30%.[2] Bad obstetric history (BOH) implies previous unfavorable fetal outcome in terms of two or more consecutive abortions, intrauterine death, early neonatal death, congenital malformations, intrauterine growth retardations, still births.[3] Cause of BOH could be genetic, hormonal, abnormal maternal immune responses and maternal infections.[3] Primary infections caused by TORCH—Toxoplasma gondii, Rubella virus, Cytomegalovirus (CMV), and Herpes simplex virus (HSV)—are the major causes of BOH.[4] The prenatal and perinatal infections, falling under the designation of TORCH complex (also known as STORCH, TORCHES, or the TORCH infections), are a medical acronym for a set of perinatal infections, i.e., infections that are passed from a pregnant woman to her fetus.[5] The TORCH infections can lead to severe fetal anomalies or even fetal loss. They are a group of viral, bacterial, and protozoan infections that gain access to the fetal bloodstream transplacental via the chorionic villi. Hematogenous transmission may occur at any time during gestation or occasionally at the time of delivery via maternal-to-fetal transfusion.[6] The ability of the fetus to resist infectious organisms is limited and the fetal immune system is unable to prevent the dissemination of infectious organisms to various tissues.[7] Early diagnosis and appropriate intervention will help in proper management of these cases.[8] The prevalence of TORCH infections varies from one geographical area to another.[5] In India, due to lack of national screening programme, there is no baseline serological data regarding the presence of an antibody in TORCH infection during pregnancy.[9] The social and reproductive maladjustment because of repeated pregnancy wastages, cost of treatment, and morbidity caused to the infant make the TORCH group of infections a major cause of concern.[10]
Materials and Methods
The present study was carried out in the department of Microbiology in collaboration with department of Obstretics and Gynaecology at a tertiary care hospital, from November 2016 to October 2018.
Study group consisted of 172 BOH cases attending Antenatal clinic. From each woman 3 mL of venous blood was collected in a vacutainer tube with strict aseptic precautions. Serum testing for TORCH infection for specific IgM antibodies. was done by Enzyme linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) using kits of Ratio Diagnostics as per manufacturer’s instruction. Ethical clearance was obtained from the Ethics committee of the institute.
Results and Observations
Maximum BOH cases were in the age group 25-30 years i.e. 45.34% (78 /172), followed by 34.88% (60/172) in the age group 19-24 years and 19.76% (34/172) in the age group 31-36 years.([Figure 1])

History of BOH cases consisted of spontaneous abortions in 80 cases (46.51%), intrauterine deaths in 32 cases (18.60%), early neonatal deaths in 24 cases (13.95%), congenital malformations in 18 cases (10.46%), still births in 12 cases (06.97%) and preterm labour in 6 cases (03.48%).([Figure 2])

TORCH agent |
Number (%) of IgM positive cases (n=172) |
T.gondii |
22 (12.79%) |
Rubella |
20 (11.62%) |
CMV |
08 (04.65%) |
HSV 2 |
04 (02.32%) |
IgM seroprevalence was found to be highest for T.gondii i.e.12.79% (22/172) followed by Rubella 11.62% (20/172), CMV 4.65% (08/172) and least for HSV-2 i.e. 2.32% (04/172). ([Table 1])
Presentation |
Toxoplasma IgM +ve |
Rubella IgM +ve |
CMV IgM +ve |
HSV-2 IgM +ve |
No. (%) |
No. (%) |
No. (%) |
No. (%) |
|
Spontaneous abortions (n=80) |
13 (16.25%) |
08 (10.00%) |
04 (05.00%) |
03(03.75%) |
Intrauterine deaths (n=32) |
01 (03.12%) |
03 (09.37%) |
01 (03.12%) |
01 (03.12%) |
Early neonatal deaths (n=24) |
02 (08.33%) |
01 (04.16%) |
00 |
00 |
Congenital malformations(n=18) |
01 (05.55%) |
04 (22.22%) |
02 (11.11%) |
00 |
Still births (n=12) |
03 (25%) |
03 (25%) |
01 (08.33%) |
00 |
Preterm labour(n=6) |
02 (33.33%) |
01 (16.66%) |
00 |
00 |
Out of 80 patients with history of spontaneous abortions maximum IgM seropositivity was for T.gondii i.e 16.25% (13/80). Out of 32 IUD cases maximum IgM seropositivity was for Rubella 9.37% (03/32). T.gondii, CMV and HSV-2 showed IgM antibodies only for one case each i.e. 3.12% (01/32). Out of 24 females who gave history of early neonatal death IgM antibodies were positive for T.gondii in 8.33% (02/24). Out of 18 females with history of congenitally malformed babies maximum IgM seropositivity was for Rubella i.e. 22.22%(04/18). Out of 12 still birth cases IgM seropositivity for T.gondii and Rubella was 25%(03/12) and 8.33% (01/12) for CMV. Out of 6 cases of preterm labour, 33.33% (02/06) and 16.66% (01/06) were positive for T.gondii and Rubella IgM respectively. ([Table 2])
Discussion
Primary infection with TORCH complex in pregnant women can lead to adverse outcome, which is initially unapparent or asymptomatic and thus difficult to diagnose on clinical grounds.[11]
Toxoplasma infection is found worldwide, particularly in warm and moist climates. About 20 – 90% of the world adult population is exposed to T.gondii.[12] The rupture of encysted Toxoplasma in the uterus of the pregnant women has disastrous ramifications on the developing fetus such as infections, and recurrent miscarriages.[10], [13] In the present study, out of 172 samples of BOH cases, 22 were positive for Toxoplasma IgM antibodies with the seroprevalence of 12.79%
This is similar to what has been reported earlier by Yashodhara et al. (2001)[14] who observed a seroprevalence of 13.1% for Toxoplasma IgM.
While seropositivity for Toxoplasma IgM has varied from 8.8% by Singh M et al. to as high as 21.54% by Agrawal et al. (2016).[15] The difference in prevalence rate between different countries can be explained by variation of geographical and climatic conditions between different areas as the success of oocysts sporulation better in hotter and wetter areas.[16]
In the present study, out of 172 samples of BOH cases, 20 were positive for Rubella IgM antibodies with the seroprevalence of 11.62%. Similarly, study by Parik et al. (2016)[9] in Rajkot and Ramana et al. (2016) [17] in Tirupati reported seroprevalence of IgM Rubella to be 12% and12.67% respectively. Various investigators from India have reported a seroprevalence of Rubella IgM ranging from 2% (Faldu et al.)[5] to 35.38% (Agrawal et al.).[15]
Primary CMV infection during pregnancy carries a high risk of the intrauterine transmission which may result in severe fetal damage, including growth retardation, jaundice, hepatosplenomegaly and CNS abnormalities.[18] In the present study, seroprevalence of CMV IgM was found to be 4.65%(08/172), similar to Faldu et al. (2015)[5] who observed seroprevalence of CMV IgM to be 4%. Previous studies from India by Parik et al. (2016)[9] in Rajkot had reported a seroprevalence of as low as 2% for CMV IgM antibodies to as high as 34.7% by Sen et al. (2012)[19] in Varanasi.
The acquisition of genital herpes during pregnancy has been associated with spontaneous abortion, prematurity, and congenital and neonatal herpes.[20] Neonatal Herpes which can be acquired in utero from maternal infections, is quite severe and it is associated with a high morbidity and mortality.[9]
Seroprevalence of HSV-2 IgM among the BOH patients in our study was 2.32% (04/172). The finding was in accordance with Padmavathy et al. (2013) and Parik et al. (2016)[9] who reported seroprevalence of HSV-2 IgM to be 2.3% and 2% respectively. Sen et al. (2011)[19] reported a very high seroprevalence for acute HSV-2 infection i.e. 33.5%
Conclusion
TORCH group of infection is an important cause of perinatal morbidity. Perhaps, India lacks any screening programme for these infection during pregnancy. Therefore, mandatory testing of TORCH agent should be done in pregnant women, especially with bad obstetric history. Increased awareness and health education regarding mode of transmission are required to minimize the risk of congenital transmission and decrease pregnancy wastage.
Source of Funding
None.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
References
- G Singh, K Sidhu. Bad Obstetric History: A Prospective Study. Med J Armed Forces India 2010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- H Umesh. Assessment of Utility of Serological Test Against TORCH Group of Agents for Bad Obstetric Outcome in Tertiary Care Hospital. Natl J Lab Med 2015. [Google Scholar]
- D Turbadkar, M Mathur, M Rele. Seroprevalence of torch infection in bad obstetric history. Indian J Med Microbiol 2003. [Google Scholar]
- M S Sadik, H Fatima, K Jamil, C Patil. Study of TORCH profile in patients with bad obstetric history. Biol Med 2012. [Google Scholar]
- B Faldu, P Panchal, H Patel, A Patel. Study of seropositivity for TORCH infections in women with Bad Obstretic History. Int J Adv Res 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Maitra, V Kumar, AK Abbas, AJC Robbins. Diseases of Infancy and Childhood. Robbins and Cotran Pathologic Basis of Disease 2014. [Google Scholar]
- N Mladina, G Mehikic, A Pasic. TORCH infections in mothers as a cause of neonatal morbidity. Med Arch 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Janak Kishore, Richa Misra, Abhiruchi Paisal, Yashodhra Pradeep. Adverse reproductive outcome induced by Parvovirus B19 and TORCH infections in women with high-risk pregnancy. J Infect Dev Ctries 2011. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- J Parikh, A Chaudhary, GU Kavathia, YS Goswami. Prevelance of Serum Antibodies to Torch Infection in Women with Bad Obstetric History Attending Tertiary Care Hospital, Gujrat. IOSR J Dent Med Sci 2016. [Google Scholar]
- RB Surpam, UP Kamlakar, R Khadse, M Qazi, SV Jalgaonkar, SV Jalgaonkar. Serological study for TORCH infections in women with bad obstetric history. J Obstet Gynecol India 2006. [Google Scholar]
- KS Devi, YG Devi, NS Singh, AM Singh, ID Singh. Seroprevalence of TORCH in women with still birth in RIMS hospital. JMS - J Med Soc 2008. [Google Scholar]
- K Nellimarla, RL Kumari. Seroprevalence of TORCH Infections in Pregnant Women with Bad Obstetric History in and around Kakinada Town, India. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- H Langer. Repeated congenital infections with toxoplasma gondii. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1963. [Google Scholar]
- P Yashodhara, BA Ramlaxmi, AN Naidu, L Raman. Prevalence of specific IgM due to Toxoplasma, Rubella, Cytomegalovirus and C. trachomoatis infection during pregnancy. Indian J Med Microbiol 2001. [Google Scholar]
- A Agrawal, SK Singh, RK Maheshwari, JK Goyal. Study of Serological Profile of Torch Infections in Women with Bad Obstetric History. Indian J Appl Res 2016. [Google Scholar]
- H Aqeely, EK El-Gayar, DP Khan, A Najmi, A Alvi, I Bani. Seroepidemiology ofToxoplasma gondiiamongst Pregnant Women in Jazan Province, Saudi Arabia. J Trop Med 2014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- BV Ramana, BK Reddy, DS Murty, KH Vasudevanaidu. Seroprevalance of rubella in women with bad obstetric history. J Fam Med Prim Care 2013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- L Goswami, K Bezborah, L Saikia. A serological study of cytomegalovirus infection in patients presenting with bad obstetric history attending Assam Medical College and Hospital. New Indian J OBGYN 2017. [Google Scholar]
- MR Sen, BN Shukla, B Tuhina. Prevalence of Serum Antibodies to TORCH Infection in and Around Varanasi, Northern India. J Clin Diagn Res 2012. [Google Scholar]
- D Biswas, B Borkakoty, J Mahanta, K Walia, L Saikia, BS Akoijam. Seroprevalence and risk factors of herpes simplex virus type-2 infection among pregnant women in Northeast India. BMC Infect Dis 2011. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]