Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research

Print ISSN: 2394-2746

Online ISSN: 2394-2754

CODEN : IJOGCS

Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research (IJOGR) open access, peer-reviewed quarterly journal publishing since 2014 and is published under auspices of the Innovative Education and Scientific Research Foundation (IESRF), aim to uplift researchers, scholars, academicians, and professionals in all academic and scientific disciplines. IESRF is dedicated to the transfer of technology and research by publishing scientific journals, research content, providing professional’s membership, and conducting conferences, seminars, and award more...

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article statistics

Viewed: 796

PDF Downloaded: 381


Get Permission Lakshmi, Lakshmi, and Kiran: To assess the knowledge regarding risk factors and preventive measures of carcinoma breast among Indian women: A comparative study


Introduction

Carcinoma is a deadly disease when it reaches to the invasive stages. Among all the cancers of females, breast cancer is the only preventable cancer when detected at its early stages. Population-based screening with breast self-examination is an important secondary preventive measure for breast cancer that leads to a high-cure rate among breast cancer patients. Against the background of the dangers posed by breast cancer world-wide and the importance of its early detection and therefore breast self-examination (BSE), this study investigated the practice of BSE among female students in tertiary institutions. A sample of 723 participants selected through a combination of multi-stage, systematic and convenience sampling methods.1 The risk factors under study were also found to be statistically significant for the study population except duration of breastfeeding and family history of breast and ovarian cancers.2 The recent GLOBOCAN 2018 report shows age-standardized breast cancer incidence rate per 100 thousand females was very high in Australia (94.2), Western Europe (92.6) and Northern Europe (90.1) whereas it was lowest in South–Central Asia (25.9) region.3 The increased burden of the disease should be accompanied by powerful means of spreading awareness by implementing campaigns that would improve knowledge deficits.4 Breast cancer occurs in every country of the world in women at any age after puberty but with increasing rates in later life. 5, 6 Across-sectional study and the meta-analytical procedure were used to assess the risk factors and preventive measures regarding the carcinoma breast.7, 8, 9 A case control study was conducted in Saudi Arabia on breast cancer survivors’ perceptions of prevention versus control of future cancer recurrence.10 Most of research on carcinoma breast were followed the cross-sectional study and use of structured questionnaire to assess the knowledge of risk factors and preventive measures of carcinoma breast.11, 12, 13, 14, 15 Multi stage sampling method was used to select the sample; structured questionnaire was used to collect the data to analyze the risk factors and its preventive measures.16, 17

Materials and Methods

The present work mainly interprets the methodology to be applied in order to assess “The knowledge regarding risk factors and its preventive measures of carcinoma breast among women in selected urban and rural areas of Tirupati, Chittoor district, Andhra Pradesh, India”.

Research approach and design

In order to satisfy the objectives of the present study, a quantitative research method is apprehended in general because it is a systematic empirical investigation of observable phenomena via statistical, mathematical or computational techniques. Therefore, the purpose of this methodology is to satisfy the research plan and target devised by the researcher. In the present study, a Cross Sectional Descriptive Research Design was considered to assess the knowledge regarding risk factors and its preventive measures of carcinoma breast among women in selected urban and rural areas of Tirupati, Chittoor district, Andhra Pradesh, India”. The present research study was conducted at permitted urban and rural areas in and around tirupati at Indira Nagar, Tirupati urban and Daminedu village, Tirupati rural mandal.

Sample size and technique

The researcher has chosen the optimum sample size as per the knowledge gained from the literature and it comprises 100 women as per the setting of the study. For the present study a Non probability-Convenient Sampling Technique was adopted to select the sample based on inclusive and exclusive criteria. The inclusion criteria consists of the women who were willing to participate in the study, living in urban and rural area and available at the time of data collection. The exclusion criteria consists of the women who were below 25 years and above 60 years of age, living other than urban and rural area and exposed to carcinoma breast.

Variables

The variables included in this study were independent variables and dependent variables. In this study independent variables include demographic variables such as environmental factor, sociological factors, nutritional factors, physiological factors, genetic factors, family risk factors, alcohol, hormonal history, history of carcinoma breast, obesity, estrogen, immune system, tobacco, infection etc. The dependent variable includes the knowledge regarding risk factors and preventive measures of carcinoma breast among women in selected urban and rural areas of Tirupati.

Development and description of the tool

The research instrument is usually determined by researcher and is tied to the study methodology. The Interviews or interactions, where verbal questions are posed by an interviewer are to elicit verbal responses from an interviewee. The interviews may be of Structured Interview, Unstructured Interview, Non-Directive Interview, Focus Interview, Focus Group Interview.

The researcher selected Structured Interview as the tool based on the objectives of the present study. Structured Interview means, a formal set of questions posed to each interviewee and recorded using a standardized procedure

A closed ended Structured Questionnaire was used to collect the necessary data from the sample. Tool was developed in English and translated in Telugu. The tool consists of Socio-demographic data and Structured Questionnaire. The Socio-demographic data consists of variables such as age, gender, educational status, Family income per month, area of residence, age at menarche, marital status, first pregnancy, parity, breast feed, age at menopause, family history and source of information about carcinoma breast. The Structured questionnaire consists of 42 items to assess the knowledge regarding risk factors of carcinoma breast, and its preventive measures among women. A total of 30 multiple choice questions which contains only one right answer and 12 statements framed as checklist with ‘yes’ or ‘no’ options. Each correct answer carries ‘1’ mark and wrong answer carries ‘0’ mark. The maximum score was 42.

Table 1

Score interpretation for structured questionnaire

Score

Marks

Level of knowledge

<50%

<16

Inadequate level of knowledge

50-75%

17-29

Moderate level of knowledge

>75%

>30

Adequate level of knowledge

Table 2

Frequency and percentage distribution of demographic variables among urban and rural women. n = 50

S. No.

Demographic Variables

Urban

Rural

Frequency (n)

Percent (%)

Frequency (n)

Percent (%)

1

Age in Years

a) 30 to 40

7

14

17

34

b) 41 to 50

27

54

13

26

c) 51 to 60

16

32

20

40

Total

50

100

50

100

2

Education

a) No formal Education

6

12

3

6

b) Primary Education

6

12

11

22

c) Secondary Education

8

16

14

28

d) Higher Secondary Education

11

22

5

10

e) Under Graduate

14

28

13

26

f) Post Graduate

2

4

3

6

g) Professional

3

6

1

2

Total

50

100

50

100

3

Family Income / Month (Rs)

a) ≤ 10,000/-

10

20

10

20

b) 10,001 – 15,000/-

14

28

14

28

c) 15,001 – 20,000/-

13

26

18

36

d) > 20,000/-

13

26

8

16

Total

50

100

50

100

4

Area of Living

a) Urban

50

100

0

0

b) Rural

0

0

50

100

Total

50

100

50

100

5

Age at Menarche in years

a) ≤ 11

5

10

2

4

b) 12 – 13

14

28

21

42

c) 14 – 15

22

44

26

52

d) >15

9

18

1

2

Total

50

100

50

100

6

Marital Status

a) Married

38

76

40

80

b) Un Married

4

8

3

6

c) Widow

8

16

7

14

Total

50

100

50

100

7

Age at First Pregnancy (in years)

a) ≤ 20

13

26

18

36

b) 21 – 24

18

36

22

44

c) 25 – 30

11

22

9

18

d) > 30

8

16

1

2

Total

50

100

50

100

8

Parity

a) Nulliparous

5

10

3

6

b) Parous

45

90

47

94

Total

50

100

50

100

9

Did you Breast Feed Your Baby

a) Yes

45

90

47

94

b) No (Specific reason)

5

10

3

6

Total

50

100

50

100

10

Age of Menopause Attained (in years)

a) < 45 – 45

7

14

3

6

b) 46 – 47

8

16

6

12

c) 48 – 50

9

18

12

24

d) > 50

4

8

4

8

e) Not yet attained

22

44

25

50

Total

50

100

50

100

11

History of Breast Carcinoma in the Family

a) 1st degree (Mother, Father)

30

60

30

60

b) 2nd degree Grandmother, Grandfather)

28

15

30

30

c) 3rd degree (Uncle, Aunty)

6

12

5

10

Total

50

100

50

100

12

Source of Information

a) Friends and Family members

9

18

12

24

b) Mass media and books

9

18

14

28

c) Health care personnel and relatives

28

56

23

46

d) Newspapers and magazines

4

8

1

2

Total

50

100

50

100

Table 3

Frequency, percentage distribution, regarding level of knowledge on risk factors of carcinoma breast among urban women n=50

Knowledge on Risk Factors of Carcinoma

Level of Knowledge

Mean

SD

Inadequate (<50%)

Moderate (51-75%)

Adequate (>75%)

Breast Among Urban Women

N

%

n

%

n

%

Knowledge on Risk Factors of Carcinoma Breast

19

38

30

60

1

2

15.60

3.423

Table 4

Frequency, percentage distribution, regarding level of knowledge on risk factors of carcinoma breast among rural women. n=50

Knowledge on Risk Factors of Carcinoma Breast Among Rural Women

Level of Knowledge

Mean

SD

Inadequate (<50%)

Moderate (51 -75 %)

Adequate (>75%)

N

%

n

%

N

%

Knowledge on Risk Factors of Carcinoma Breast

28

56

19

38

3

6

14.58

4.978

Figure 1

Level of knowledge on prevention carcinoma breast among urban and rural women

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/a31fb9dd-61de-4ae5-b386-811f89a68a5f/image/be773ba1-3659-4036-9f58-33fb6e14763f-uimage.png

Reliability of the tool

To establish the reliability of the tool Cronbach’s Alpha Reliability method was used. Tool was administered to 10 women who were not included in the final study. The reliability score obtained for knowledge on breast cancer was “r = 0.90,” whereas the reliability score obtained for practices on prevention of carcinoma breast was “r = 0.85”, shows that the tool was reliable.

Plan for analysis

The study was planned to analyze based on the study objectives with the help of descriptive and inferential statistics. In the Descriptive Statistics the Frequency and percentage distribution were used to assess demographic data among women in rural and urban areas of Tirupati. The Percentage, mean and standard deviation were used to estimate the level of knowledge among women in rural and urban areas of Tirupati. In the Inferential Statistics the Chi-square test was used to identify the association between knowledge on carcinoma breast with selected demographic variables and “t- test” was used to compare knowledge on cancer breast and preventive measures among women in urban and rural area of Tirupati.

Analysis and interpretation

The present research study deals with analysis and interpretation of data collected from 50 women from urban and 50 women from rural areas at Tirupati. The data were tabulated, analyzed and interpreted using discipline and inferential statistics. The Frequency and percentage distribution of demographic variables among urban and rural women are given inTable 2 . The Frequency, percentage distribution, Mean and Standard deviation regarding level of knowledge on carcinoma breast among urban and rural women are given in Table 3, Table 4. Out of 50 urban women, 19 (38%) had inadequate knowledge, 30 (60%) had moderate knowledge and only 1 (2%) had adequate level of knowledge, with mean and standard deviation score was 15.6 and 3.423 respectively. Out of 50 rural women, 28(56%) had adequate knowledge, 19 (38%) had moderate and 28 (56%) had adequate knowledge with mean and standard deviation 14.58 and 4.978. The Frequency, Percentage distribution, Mean and Standard deviation regarding level of practices on prevention of carcinoma breast among urban and rural women are shown in Figure 1.

Results & Discussions

The results based on the stated objectives and provide exclusion for testing. The stated hypothesis is leading to conclusions, recommendations and for further generalization, utilization of the results.

This study was undertaken to assess the knowledge regarding risk factors and preventive measures of carcinoma breast among urban and rural women in selected areas of tirupati. The discussion of present study was based on the findings obtained from descriptive and inferential statistical analysis of the collected data.

The study findings revealed that regarding knowledge among women, out of 50 urban women, majority of them 30 (60%) had moderate knowledge, 19 (38%) had inadequate knowledge and 1 (2%) had adequate level of knowledge regarding risk factors of carcinoma breast. The mean score of level of knowledge was 15.6 and standard deviation was 3.42. Whereas among rural women out of 50, majority 28 (56%) had inadequate knowledge followed by 19 (38%) had moderate knowledge and only 3 (6%) had adequate knowledge. Mean knowledge score was 14.58 and standard deviation was 4.97.

The above objective was supported by previous study conducted in Mumbai India.3 The Study was used 480 women aged 82-55 years. A structured questionnaire was used to collect the data. The study found that results were (49%) of women were aware of risk factors of carcinoma breast conducted that large intervention to enhance the knowledge of carcinoma breast among women particular region is required.

Related on preventive measures of carcinoma breast among women, out of 50 urban women, majority 26 (52%) had moderate practices, followed by 23(46%) had adequate practices and only 1 (2%) had inadequate practices. The obtained mean score 10.86 and standard deviation was 2.46. Whereas among rural women out of 50, 32 (64%) had moderate level of practices, 10 (20%) had adequate practices and least 8 (16%) had inadequate practices. The obtained mean and standard deviation were 9.40 and 2.44.

The above objective was supported by previous study conducted by Monira Alwhaib, Soudi Arabia.10 Women with a history of breast cancer (n=114) were surveyed, and data were analyzed using concurrent mixed methods. Binary logistic regression models examined predictors of perceived prevention and perceived control of cancer recurrence.

Conclusions

The major conclusions are inferred from the present work related to knowledge regarding risk factors of carcinoma breast majority of urban women I.e. 30 (60%) had moderate knowledge and majority of rural women i.e. 28 (56%) had inadequate knowledge. Related to knowledge on preventive measures of carcinoma breast, majority of urban women 26 (52%) had moderate knowledge on preventive measures and majority of rural women i.e., 32 (64%) also had moderate level of knowledge on preventive measures of carcinoma breast. These findings concluded that there was difference between urban and rural women related to knowledge on risk factors and preventive measures of carcinoma breast. These findings suggestive that extensive health education programmes were needed to bring awareness among urban and rural women so nurses need to encourage improving knowledge among women regarding knowledge on risk factors and preventive measures of carcinoma breast by organizing structured teaching programmes in urban and rural community to bring down the mortality and morbidity.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1 

JA Agbonifoh Breast Self-Examination Practice among Female Students of Tertiary InstitutionsJ Educ Pract20160712118

2 

AR Kanti NK Mondal B Chhatui HM Sepai Relevance of risk factors of breast cancer in women: An Eastern Indian scenario”J Cancer Res Ther20161213028

3 

RK Prusty Knowledge of symptoms and risk factors of breast cancer among women: a community based study in a low socio-economic area of Mumbai, IndiaBMC Women's Health20202010611210.1186/s12905-020-00967-x

4 

M Younis D Al-Rubaye H Haddad A Hammad M Hijazi Knowledge and Awareness of Breast Cancer among Young Women in the United Arab Emirates”Adv Breast Cancer Res20165116376

5 

Andres Macari Prevalence and Molecular Profile of Breast carcinoma Using Immunohistochemistry Makers in Mexican Women”World Journal of oncology202124119123

6 

S Olayide Agodirin Prevalence of Themes Linked to Delayed Presentation of Breast Cancer in Africa: A Meta-Analysis of Patient-Reported StudiesJCO Global Oncology20206731742

7 

S Sayed Breast cancer risk factors in relation to molecular subtypes in breast cancer patients from Kenya”Breast Cancer Res20212368117

8 

MP Antony B Surakutty TA Vasu M Chisthi Risk Factors for Breast Cancer among Indian Women: A Case-control Study”Niger J Clin Pract201821443642

9 

RK Prusty S Begum A Patil DD Naik S Pimple G Mishra Knowledge of symptoms and risk factors of breast cancer among women: a community based study in a low socio-economic area of Mumbai, India”BMC Women’s Health20202010611210.1186/s12905-020-00967-x

10 

Monira Alwhaibi Breast Cancer Survivors’ Perceptions of Prevention versus Control of Future Cancer Recurrence”International Journal of Breast Cancer2019112

11 

K Ayre C Parker Lymphedema after treatment of breast cancer: a comprehensive reviewJ Unexplored Med Data201945115

12 

NJ Engmann MK Golmakani DL Miglioretti BL Sprague K Kerlikowske Population-Attributable Risk Proportion of Clinical Risk Factors for Breast CancerJAMA Oncol201739122836

13 

AG Alrashidi HG Ahmed KJK Alshammeri Knowledge and Perceptions of Common Breast Cancer Risk Factors in Northern Saudi ArabiaAsian Pac J Cancer Prev20171810275561

14 

R Singh A Turuk A study to assess the knowledge regarding breast cancer and practices of breast self-examination among women in urban area”Int J Community Med Public Health201841143417

15 

S Madhukumar A study on awareness about breast carcinoma and practice of breast self-examination among basic sciences college studentsJ Family Med Prim Care201706348790

16 

ET Thomas CD Mar P Glasziou G Wright A Barratt Prevalence of incidental breast cancer and precursor lesions in autopsy studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis”BMC Cancer2017171808

17 

AL Tertese An overview of breast cancer epidemiology, risk factors, pathophysiology, and cancer risks reductionMOJ Biol Med201714926



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Article type

Original Article


Article page

88-94


Authors Details

N Dhana Lakshmi*, K Vara Lakshmi, C Usha Kiran


Article History

Received : 10-11-2021

Accepted : 02-12-2021


Article Metrics


View Article As

 


Downlaod Files