Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research

Print ISSN: 2394-2746

Online ISSN: 2394-2754

CODEN : IJOGCS

Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research (IJOGR) open access, peer-reviewed quarterly journal publishing since 2014 and is published under auspices of the Innovative Education and Scientific Research Foundation (IESRF), aim to uplift researchers, scholars, academicians, and professionals in all academic and scientific disciplines. IESRF is dedicated to the transfer of technology and research by publishing scientific journals, research content, providing professional’s membership, and conducting conferences, seminars, and award more...

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article statistics

Viewed: 475

PDF Downloaded: 321


Get Permission Vangani, Vangani, and Vangani: High risk pregnancies and implications of color Doppler


Introduction

Pregnancy can be considered as the most beautiful Period of a woman's life. The pregnancy is continuously observed by clinical examination, laboratory investigations and radio graphic examinations at exact intervals through its course.1

In obstetrics, the use of doppler ultrasound is to Study blood flow to assess fetal inaccessibility. Noninvasive investigation of feted circulation has become possible with the use of doppler as abnormal fetal circulation is considered a major factor in fetal growth restrictions.2 Major cause of high risk pregnancies are pregnancy induced hypertension (PIH) or gestations hypertensions being one of the most common. Considering the above facts the present study in high risk pregnancy and to correlate the finding of doppler with clinical finding in high-risk pregnant women.3, 4

Materials and Methods

Total 100 were selected with purposive sampling technique, (50 cases) study group of high risk pregnancy taken into the study & compared with an equal number of women with normal pregnancy without complication. The color Doppler wave form of MCA umbilical artery was done for all cases b/w 28 to 37 weeks of gestation in both the groups.

Place & duration of study

Suryanagri hospital, Jodhpur, Rajasthan. One year (2019-2020).

Inclusion criteria

Women with gestational age greater than 34 weeks with risk factors like Anemia, Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy, GDM, Multiple pregnancies, IUGR, cardiac disease etc.

Exclusion criteria

Pregnancies with gestational age less than 34 weeks, post dated pregnancies etc.

Results

Table 1

Socio‑demographic data

Variables Group A,

Variables Group A n=100 (%)

Variables Group B, n=100 (%)

P ‑value

Demography age groups in years

<24

14

27

0.023

24‑34

48

30

>34

37

44

Parity

Primipara

13

21

0.039

Multipara

87

79

Consanguinity

Yes

21

13

0.97

No

79

87

Table 2

Maternal & fetal clinical profile & outcome

Variables Group A,

Variables Group A n=100 (%)

Variables Group B, n=100 (%)

P‑value

Amniotic fluid

Normal

41

73

0.0283

Poly/oligohydromnios

59

27

Labor induction

Yes

15

09

0.22

Mode of delivery

C‑section

79

21

Gestational age

Pre‑term

39

26

0.69

Normal

88

94

Placenta

Abnormal location

11

06

0.0471

Calcified

01

00

Table 3

Risk of emergency caesarean section with relation to Doppler findings

Variables

Emergency C‑section

P‑value

Risk of emergency C‑section in Group A (normal Doppler vs. abnormal Doppler)

0.32008

Normal Doppler

30

Abnormal Doppler

13

Risk of emergency C‑section (normal Doppler in group A vs. group B without Doppler)

Normal Doppler

32

Group B with C‑section

61

Risk of emergency C‑section (abnormal Doppler in group A vs. group B without Doppler)

Abnormal Doppler with C‑section

14

Group B with C‑section

63

Discussion

In our study, it has conclusively proved that the resistance index in the MCA steadily declined as compared to the study group from 28-36 weeks.5 When the maximum incidence of IUD is reported. Our study also shows that the A/B ratio in the MCA was the highest around 28 weeks of gestation & fall of A/B ratio is present up to term to facilitate increase blood flow. But this fall is statistically less than that of control group.6 The MCA pulsatility index also showed a high at around 28 weeks with a study decline up to term which is significantly less than that of controls. The umbilical artery blood flow studies show that the peak.7 PI levels are at 30 weeks of gestation with a study decline & at 36 weeks there is a rise showing that there is resistance to blood flow as compared to control group & there is steady decline at term. The pulsatility index in the high-risk group as showed steady decline up to 6 weeks & rise nearing term.2 The A/B ratio in study group at around 30 weeks & study decline at 36 weeks & an abrupt ripe at term. In the control group the mean. A/B ratio steady decline in with minimum values at term.

Doppler measurements can be obtained from the umbilical artery (UA), middle cerebral artery (MCA), ductus venosus (DV) and uterine arteries. The pulsatility index (PI) and resistance index (RI) are used for the arteries and the peak velocity index (PVI) is used for the veins. Abnormal umbilical artery Doppler flow velocimetry is defined as a pulsatility index (PI) >2 standard deviations (SD) above the mean for gestational age and / or absence or reversal of end-diastolic flow. Umbilical artery Doppler reflects downstream placental vascular resistance, correlated with intrauterine growth restriction and the multisystem effects of placental deficiency. Abnormalities are progressive, with reduction, loss and finally a reversal of diastolic flow. When blood flow in the umbilical arteries become abnormal, the differentiation of fetus status requires Doppler information from systemic vessels, as middle cerebral artery and ductus venosus. The middle cerebral artery is the vessel of choice to assess the fetal cerebral circulation because it is easy to identify.2 When the fetus is hypoxic, the cerebral arteries tend to become dilated in order to preserve the blood flow to the brain. In the middle cerebral artery, the systolic to diastolic (A/B) ratio will decrease (due to an increase in diastolic flow) in the presence of chronic hypoxic insult to the fetus. This increase in blood flow can be evidenced by Doppler ultrasound of the middle cerebral artery. This effect has been called "brain sparing effect" and is demonstrated by a lower value of the pulsatility index. In fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) a pulsatility index below the normal range indicates a greater risk of adverse perinatal outcome. The brain sparing effect may be temporary, as reported during prolonged hypoxemia in animal experiments, and the overstressed human fetus can also lose the brain sparing effect. The disappearance of the brain sparing effect is a critical event for the fetus, and appears to precede fetal death.8

Doppler ultrasound of the umbilical artery is more helpful than other tests of fetal wellbeing, namely cardiotocography and biophysical profile score in distinguishing between the normal small fetus and the ‘sick’ small fetus.

The effects of Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies on obstetrical care and fetal outcomes were systematically reviewed (Neilson 2003).9 The use of Doppler in pregnancies complicated by hypertension or presumed impaired fetal growth was associated with a trend in reduction of perinatal deaths.

Conclusion

Assessment of fetal well-being in high risk pregnancies is done by a variety of methods includes NST, biophysical profile & daily fetal movement count (DFMC). The positive predictive value for assessment of fetal Doppler flow velocimetry has revolutionized the diagnosis of abnormal blood flow the foeto-placental bed, & early identification of these abnormal patterns are useful in the determining the optimal time for delivery to reduce the perinatal mortality.

In high risk women like pre eclampsia, diabetes & IUGR. Color Doppler flow velocimetry done repeatedly can predict address foetal events with a great degree of accuracy. Results obtained in study where clinically & statistically significant. Every tertiary hospital should routinely make use of facility for the assessment of fetal well-being in high risk cases & ensure a better perinatal outcome.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1 

R Cruz-Martinez F Figueras The role of Doppler and placental screeningBest Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol200923684555

2 

N AlQahtani Doppler ultrasound in the assessment ofsuspected intra‑uterine growth restrictionAnn Afr Med201110426671

3 

M DeBono RD Fawdry RD Lilford Site of trials for evaluationof antenatal tests of fetal wellbeing in high-risk pregnancyJ Perinat Med1990187787

4 

BJ Trudinger CM Cook RS Thompson WB Giles A Connelly Low-dose aspirin therapy improves fetal weight in umbilical placental insufficiencyAm J Obstet Gynecol198815936815

5 

A Jain G Kumar S Kharakwal Placental thickness: a sonographic indicator of gestational ageJ Obst Gyne India2001513489

6 

SN Tyrrell RJ Lilford HN Macdonald EJ Nelson J Porter JK Gupta Randomized comparison of routine vs highly selective use of Doppler ultrasound and biophysical scoringto investigate high risk pregnanciesBr J Obstet Gynaecol1990971090916

7 

A Imdad MY Yakoob S Siddiqui ZA Bhutta Screening andtriage of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) in generalpopulation and high risk pregnancies: A systematic reviewwith a focus on reduction of IUGR related stillbirthsBMC Public Health201111Suppl 310.1186/1471-2458-11-S3-S1

8 

C Hoffman HL Galan Assessing the ‘at-risk’ fetus: Doppler ultrasoundCurr Opin Obstet Gynecol20092121616

9 

JP Neilson Z Alfirevic Doppler ultrasound for fetal assessment in high risk pregnanciesCochrane Database Syst Rev20002CD00007310.1002/14651858.CD000073



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Article type

Original Article


Article page

498-500


Authors Details

Veena Vangani*, Mahendra Vangani, Bhavya Vangani


Article History

Received : 08-06-2022

Accepted : 27-07-2022


Article Metrics


View Article As

 


Downlaod Files