Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research

Print ISSN: 2394-2746

Online ISSN: 2394-2754

CODEN : IJOGCS

Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research (IJOGR) open access, peer-reviewed quarterly journal publishing since 2014 and is published under auspices of the Innovative Education and Scientific Research Foundation (IESRF), aim to uplift researchers, scholars, academicians, and professionals in all academic and scientific disciplines. IESRF is dedicated to the transfer of technology and research by publishing scientific journals, research content, providing professional’s membership, and conducting conferences, seminars, and award more...

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article statistics

Viewed: 569

PDF Downloaded: 217


Get Permission Singh, Srivastava, and Kaur: Facilitators and barriers in acceptance of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive devices in Bihar


Introduction

Family planning is a crucial health care intervention throughout a woman’s reproductive life.1 It is a very useful tool for improving maternal health by decreasing induced abortion rates. In developing countries, low accessibility to health facilities and lack of awareness about contraception, time period around pregnancy (before, during and post partum) is the only chance to get to a health facility, in other words, it is ‘crisis oriented’.2 Postpartum IUCD (PPIUCD) is an intrauterine contraceptive device inserted during the immediate postpartum period (Post placental and within 48 hours after delivery), which specifically focuses on the prevention of unintended pregnancies and for spacing of pregnancies. Higher institutional delivery is an opportunity for PPIUCD insertion due to increased motivation and proper counselling at the appropriate time. PPIUCD offers advantages such as safety, fewer side effects, lesser discomfort, lower chances of infection, protection against unwanted pregnancy and consequently, from abortion. Furthermore, there is no interference with breastfeeding as well.2

In 1952, India was the first country among the developing countries to launch a nation-wide family planning programme. Postpartum IUCD (PPIUCD) services were introduced in 2010 in facilities, which had high number of deliveries. Since then, these services have been scaling up throughout the country, in a phased manner. As per annual report 2018-19 (MoHFW) PPIUCD service use was first reported in 2015 as 43829, which increased to 2226499 by 2019. In 2018-19, out of total PPIUCD users, two-third users were reported in 6 states-West Bengal (16.9%), Uttar Pradesh (13.5%), Rajasthan (10.3%), Madhya Pradesh (10.1%), Tamil Nadu (8.1%) and Bihar (7.9%) whereas one-third reported in remaining 23 states and 7 UT.3

Studies conducted suggest that reasons for acceptance as appropriate and detailed counseling,4, 5 motivation,6, 7 awareness,4, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 safety and effectiveness14, 7, 13, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 and availability of trained service providers.6, 11, 12, 23 Some studies concentrated on counselling during ANC visits10, 13, 24, 25 and counselling of spouse and family members9, 13, 16 whereas, others preferred this method due to sufficiently long duration4, 13, 16, 18, 19, 26 of action for meant for spacing between births. Few studies also suggested that PPIUCD being cost effective7, 18 is another reason for its acceptance while one of the studies said that incentivization to motivator10 is a reason for acceptance.

Studies conducted on barriers in PPIUCD use show that reasons for non-acceptance of PPIUCD were lack of appropriate counseling,1 health issues/side effects,15, 26 disapproval or lack of support from Husband/Family members,1, 4, 8, 9 lack of awareness,2, 8, 9, 27 fear of complications4, 8, 24, 25 and illiteracy.2 A few other studies showed preference of another method8 and social and religious taboos2 to be barriers in acceptance of PPIUCD as a method of contraception.

Comprehensive counseling, publicity through mass media, promoting through primary community mobilizers such as ASHA and ANMs, and educational campaigns regarding PPIUCD are required to increase the acceptance of PPIUCD.27

In this study, we aim to find the facilitators and barriers for acceptance of PPIUCD from the perspective of beneficiaries and service providers along with suggestions for increasing PPIUCD use.

Materials and Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted in nine divisional Headquarter districts of Bihar - Patna, Muzaffarpur, Chhapra (Saran), Darbhanga, Saharsa, Purnia, Bhagalpur, Munger and Gaya. It took place in 9 district hospitals, 27 community health centers (CHCs)/primary health centers (PHCs), 81 sub-centers and 162 villages in nine divisional headquarter districts of Bihar. The study population were women 18-49 years of age, who had delivery at an institution within past 3 years and provided informed consent to participate in the study and health service providers.

This study used quantitative and qualitative research techniques - Interviews among women including PPIUCD users, In-depth discussions among services providers (Table 1) were conducted to generate the required information.

Along with district hospitals from each of the nine divisional headquarters of Bihar, three blocks were selected based on performance in terms of institutional deliveries. From each block, three Subcenters were selected through purposive sampling, based on spatial location from concerned PHC’s. In addition to 12 OBG Medical Officers (Labour Room) from District Hospital, 23 OBG Medical Officers (Labour Room) from block PHC/CHC were interviewed. Also, 24 OBG Nursing Staff (Labour Room) selected from District Hospital and Block PHC along with 8 FP Counsellor from District Hospital were interviewed. As and when Block managers and civil surgeons were available for the interviews, they were taken up as study participants. For household visits, one sub-centre village and one outreach village will be selected. From each sub-centre, one ANM and from each village, one ASHA were interviewed. From each PSU/village, listing of household where institutional deliveries occurred within 3 years from date of the survey was done from the records given by ASHA. Ten households were selected through systematic random sampling for home visits from the list of institutional deliveries. Proposed sample size and actual sample size i.e. number of interviews conducted is give Table 1.

Table 1

Sample size

Particulars

Number Per District

Total proposed Sample size

Actual Sample size

Facility/Location 

District Hospital (DH)

1

9

9

Block PHC (BPHC)

3

27

27

SC (sub centre)

9

81

81

Sub-centre -Village

9

81

81

Outreach Village

9

81

81

Study Participants

A: OBG Medical Officer ( Labour Room)

1. DH (District Hospital)

1

9

12

2. BPHC/CHC (Block Primary Health Centre/Community Health Centre)

3

27

23

B: OBG ( Obstetrics and Gynecology) Nursing Staff ( Labour Room)

1. DH

2

18

19

2. BPHC/CHC

3

27

5

C: FPC (Family Planning Counsellor)

1

9

8

D: DPC (District Planning Co-ordinator)

1

E: CS (Civil Surgeon)

7

F: ANM (Auxiliary Midwife Nurse)

9

81

101

G: ASHA (Accredited Social Health Activist)

18

162

159

H: Block manager (BM)

9

Total Healthcare personnel

37

333

344

I: Eligible Women

180

1620

1620

Total Interview

220

1953

1964

The data was collected by trained field investigators under the supervision of field supervisors, research officer and project coordinators. Survey tools were translated in the local language i.e Hindi and pre-tested at Patna and finalized. Data collection was done during July- December 2019, and data was analyzed using SPSS.

Ethical clearance: The study protocol approval was obtained from the ethical committee of IIHMR, New Delhi; Individual consent was also obtained prior to the interview.

Results

Factors for the continuation of PPIUCD by Current-users

Figure 1 shows the acceptance and satisfaction with the decision to choose PPIUCD and reasons for choosing it. Out of 269 women who chose PPIUCD as their choice of contraceptive method, Majority (83.3%) reported to be satisfied with this method. Out of these 224 women who are satisfied by PPIUCD, 37.9% said that they found this method to be safe and effective, 29.0% were satisfied with the reversibility, 20.5% said that their husband allowed it and only 12.1% of women highlighted its long duration of use.

Figure 1

Reasons for satisfaction by PPIUCD usage

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/5c68bfb6-4281-4351-a012-4a3a0a7bd394/image/b99653be-4018-4e4b-b4ab-6f59159bb518-uimage.png

Table 2 shows source of first information of PPIUCD, counselling by personnel and health facilities where PPIUCD was inserted. Majority of Current-users of PPIUCD were counselled by ASHA (86.2%) and ANM/Nurse (10.4%). Their first source of information on PPIUCD are ASHA/Anganwadi worker (91.8%) followed by hospital (4.5%), friends (2.2%), home (1.1%) and television (0.4%). 92.9% women using PPIUCD got it from PHC/CHC/Sub district hospital followed by District Hospital (7.1%).

Table 2

Source of first information of PPIUCD, counselling by personnel and health facilities where PPIUCD was inserted, Bihar, 2019

Source of first information on PPIUCD (%)

Counselled by personnel (%)

Family and friends

3.3

Self-decision

2.2

Television

0.4

ASHA

86.2

Hospital

4.5

Counsellor

1.1

ASHA/AWW

91.8

ANM/Nurse

10.4

Place for obtaining PPIUCD (%)

SDH level facilities

92.9

District Hospital- DH

7.1

Number (n)

269

Factors for acceptance of PPIUCD: Table 3 show factors for acceptance of PPIUCD by Never-users and Current-users of PPIUCD. Never-users of PPIUCD (766) said that spreading more awareness is a major acceptance factor for PPIUCD use (71.6%), followed by incentivization – in monetary or non-monetary form (30.2%). Current-users said that the acceptance factors were spreading more awareness (53.2%), incentivization (50.5%), Better quality of device or services/Incentivization and proper training to ASHA/ANM (2.6%).

Table 3

Facilitating factors for acceptance of PPIUCD by never-users and current-users of PPIUCD, Bihar, 2019

Facilitating factors

Never-users (%)

Current-users (%)

Incentives should be given to users – monetary or grain/asset forms

30.2

50.5

More awareness should be spread among common people

71.6

53.2

Regular follow up checkups after PPIUCD insertion

0

.5

Free treatment in case of post op complications

0

.5

Better quality device/incentives and proper training to ASHA and ANM

2.3

2.6

Total (%) 

104.0^

107.4^

Number

766

269

[i] ^Percentages are more than 100 because of multiple choice questions.

Most of the women during focus group discussions (FGDs) pointed out that awareness of PPIUCD, proper counselling to the beneficiary as well as family members and incentives given to beneficiaries are the main facilitating factors for acceptance of PPIUCD. Some women have responded positively about the method in terms of providing a better opportunity to make desired appropriate gap between the births conveniently and have no side effects. They also pointed out the need for an awareness campaign and publicity to reach out the large number of potential users and suggested that the PPIUCD method should be more advertised and popularized among the masses and its proper availability and functionality should be ensured at the facilities.

Barriers

Factors for discontinuation of PPIUCD

The number of women who have ever used PPIUCD and number of women who are currently using PPIUCD is 363 and 269 respectively in the sample. Thus, women who used PPIUCD in the past and are not currently using it are 94 and the discontinuation rate of PPIUCD is 25.9%.

Table 4 depicts the reasons for discontinuation of PPIUCD which are mainly due to health issues (48.9%) followed by want to conceive soon (27.7%) and side effects (19.1%). The remaining 2.1% each said Husband says so and want to try some other method (Figure 2).

Table 4

Reasons for discontinuation of PPIUCD, Bihar (n=94)

Reasons for drop-out

Percent

Want to conceive soon

27.7

Health issues

48.9

Side effects

19.1

Husband says so

2.1

Want to try some other method

2.1

Figure 2 depicts the extent and distribution of complications/side effects observed by women while using the PPIUCD method. Out of 94 women, 63 (67%) said that they observed complications/side effects while using PPIUCD method. Out of these 63 women, menstrual disturbances and pain in the abdomen (36.5% each), Infection (17.5%) and Expulsion of PPIUCD (7.9%) and perforation (1.6%) are the various complications observed while using the PPIUCD method of contraception.

Figure 2

Complications or side effects of PPIUCD, Bihar (n=94)

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/5c68bfb6-4281-4351-a012-4a3a0a7bd394/image/1cbc8249-a50e-43de-b0b5-af7f02fa8171-uimage.png

Barriers for the non-acceptance of PPIUCD

Table 5 depicts reasons for non-acceptance and discontinuation of PPIUCD by users who have never used PPIUCD and those who discontinued its use. Out of 766 women who have not used PPIUCD, 36.1% gave the reason for non-acceptance as the preference of another method followed by opposition from husbands and family members (35.9%), health problems and side effects such as heavy bleeding, being unfit for PPIUCD (23.4%), lack of awareness (19.3%), rumours/fears/misconceptions about cancer (13.5%), Religious barriers (1.8%), need to get pregnant (1.6%).

Out of 94 women who have discontinued PPIUCD, two-third (66.7%) believe that health problems and side effects such as heavy bleeding, and being unfit for PPIUCD is the major reason for the barrier in the continuation of PPIUCD followed by opposition from husband and family members (28.9%), preference of another method followed by (13.3%), Rumors/fears/misconceptions about cancer (8.9%), lack of awareness and desire to get pregnant (6.7% each).

Table 5

Barriers/reasons for non-acceptance and discontinuation of PPIUCD use in Bihar, 2019

Barriers

Non-acceptance (%), n=766

Discontinued (%), n=94

Husband/Family disapproval

35.9

28.9

Health issues/side effects

23.4

66.7

Preference of another method

36.1

13.3

Fear/misconception about cancer

13.5

8.9

Lack of awareness

19.3

6.7

Husband away

0.8

2.2

Desire to get pregnant

1.6

6.7

Religious beliefs

1.8

0.0

Percentage

134.3^

135.6^

[i] ^Percentages are more than 100 because of multiple choice questions.

As per FGD analysis, key barriers perceived by women are lack of awareness about PPIUCD, misconception among beneficiaries regarding PPIUCD that it might cause cancer, side effects (problem of bleeding, infection, pain during periods and thread, which is visible through vagina due to improper placement of PPIUCD/IUCD at the time of insertion.). The other issues raised by the members of some FGD were the quality of services provided during PPIUCD insertion. It is also pertinent to highlight that a well-trained health staffs should be involved in PPIUCD insertion.

As mentioned by women during FGDs in Bihar, some difficulties related to PPIUCD create a negative message among the people and they avoid getting PPIUCD method. It has been noticed that in such circumstances even ASHA avoids to counsel the women due to fear of physical harm by the guardians of the women if anything goes wrong due to insertion of PPIUCD method. The discussion pointed out that these women need proper counseling and awareness by the top-level health officials like doctors to overcome the rumors and misconceptions about the PPIUCD.

Perception of service providers about factors for acceptance of PPIUCD

Table 6 shows that various reason for acceptance of PPIUCD as perceived by service providers. Out of 344, 315 service providers gave facilitating factors/reasons for acceptance of PPIUCD. More than half (51.1%) of the healthcare personnel said that spacing between births is the reason for acceptance of PPIUCD whereas only 3.8% said that long duration of use is the reason for acceptance for PPIUCD. About two-fifth (41.6%) of health personnel said that counselling is the reason for acceptance of PPIUCD followed by no side effects (14%), awareness (7.6%), literacy (6.7%) and convenience/no need for regular use (5.1%).

Table 6

Reasons for acceptance of PPIUCD in Bihar, 2019

Healthcare Providers

Spacing

Counselling

No side effects

Awareness

Literacy

Convenient

Long duration of action

Faith on service provider

Religion

Incentives

No other contraceptive method required

Free of cost

Number of personnel responded

Number of personnel surveyed

BM

88.9

0.0

33.3

0.0

0.0

22.2

11.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

9

9

FPC

12.5

100

12.5

0.0

37.5

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

12.5

0.0

8

8

ASHA

64.6

25.0

17.4

9.0

4.9

7.6

4.2

0.7

1.4

0.7

0.7

0.0

144

159

ANM

41.1

47.4

12.6

7.4

5.3

0.0

3.2

2.1

2.1

1.1

2.1

1.1

95

101

MO/CMO / Doctor

50.0

31.8

9.1

9.1

9.1

4.5

9.1

0.0

4.5

4.5

0.0

0.0

22

22

GNM/SN

31.6

78.9

0.0

0.0

10.5

5.3

0.0

10.5

0.0

5.3

0.0

5.3

19

24

Gynecologist

10.0

90.0

0.0

20.0

10.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

10

13

CS/DPC

25.0

100

12.5

0.0

12.5

12.5

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

8

8

Total

161

131

44

24

21

16

12

5

5

4

4

2

315

344

Percent^^

51.1

41.6

14.0

7.6

6.7

5.1

3.8

1.6

1.6

1.3

1.3

0.6

[i] ^^Total of the percentages are more than 100 because of multiple choice questions.

Out of 159, 144 Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHAs) have given reason for acceptance for PPIUCD and out of these 64.6% perceive spacing between births are the reason as against counselling (25%), convenience (17.4%) and awareness (9%). Further, out of 101 Auxiliary Nurse Midwives (ANMs) surveyed, 95 have given the reasons of acceptance in the following order – counselling (47.4%), spacing (41.1%), no side effects (12.6%), awareness (7.4%).

As per gynaecologists, counselling (90%) followed by awareness (20%), Literacy and spacing (10% each) are some of the reasons for PPIUCD acceptance. According to 19 GNMs, counselling (78.9%), spacing (31.6%), Literacy and faith on service providers (10.5% each) are some of the reasons for PPIUCD acceptance. All 8 CSs reported counselling as main reason for PPIUCD acceptance followed by spacing (25%), no side effects, literacy, convenience/no need for regular use (12.5% each).

Table 7 depicts various barriers in PPIUCD acceptance as perceived by Health personnel in Bihar, Out of 344 personnel, 46.1% believe that Health problems/Side effects followed by Rumors/Fear/Misconceptions (36.8%), opposition from husband and family members (22.5%), are some of the major barriers in PPIUCD acceptance.

Table 7

Barriers for non-acceptance of PPIUCD as perceived by Health personnel in Bihar, 2019

Healthcare Providers

Health Problems/ Side effects

Rumors/ Fear / Misconceptions

Husband and Family members

Lack of awareness/ counselling

Cultural / religious barriers

Illiteracy

Expulsion of PPIUCD

Preference of other methods

Service / Trained Staff / PPIUCD unavailable

Inconvenient

Lack/ delayed incentives

Number of personnel responded

Number of personnel surveyed

BM

88.9

0.0

11.1

11.1

0.0

0.0

11.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

9

9

FPC

62.5

75.0

37.5

0.0

12.5

12.5

12.5

0.0

12.5

0.0

0.0

8

8

ASHA

53.2

30.1

22.4

3.8

7.1

3.8

1.3

2.6

0.6

0.6

0.0

156

159

ANM

41.8

41.8

21.4

7.1

3.1

2.0

2.0

6.1

3.1

0.0

0.0

98

101

MO/CMO/ Doctor

40.0

30.0

15.0

20.0

0.0

0.0

15.0

5.0

5.0

0.0

5.0

20

22

GNM/SN

31.8

59.1

31.8

4.5

13.6

13.6

4.5

0.0

9.1

0.0

4.5

22

24

Gynecologist

0.0

46.2

15.4

15.4

7.7

30.8

15.4

0.0

23.1

0.0

0.0

13

13

CS/DPC

25.0

50.0

37.5

37.5

12.5

37.5

50.0

25.0

0.0

12.5

0.0

8

8

Total

154

123

75

24

20

19

16

13

11

2

2

334

344

Percent^^

46.1

36.8

22.5

7.2

6.0

5.7

4.8

3.9

3.3

0.6

0.6

[i] ^^Total of the percentages are more than 100 because of multiple choice questions.

Out of 156 ASHAs who gave response, 53.2% perceive Health problem/side effects as main barrier for acceptance of PPIUCD followed by Rumors/Fear/Misconceptions (30.1%) and opposition from husband and family members (22.4%). ANMs also perceived Health problem/side effects (41.8%), Rumors/Fear/Misconceptions (41.8%) and opposition from husband and family members (21.4%) as main barriers for PPIUCD acceptance. Gynecologists perceived Rumors/Fear/Misconceptions (46.2%), Illiteracy (30.8%) and unavailable Service/Trained Staff/PPIUCD (23.1%) as main barrier for acceptance of PPIUCD.

Table 8

Recommendations for increasing the acceptance of PPIUCD as perceived by Health personnel in Bihar, 2019

Healthcare Providers 

Counselling (At the time of delivery, since ANC, of family members)

Awareness/ Publicity

Training of health care providers

Providing Incentives to Beneficiary

incentivizing ASHA, ANM and other health care providers

Better quality of device / service

Improving level of education

Regular post op checkups and care

free post op care in case of complications

Number of personnel responded

Number of personnel surveyed

BM

100.0

33.3

11.1

44.4

22.2

11.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

9

9

FPC

28.6

71.4

57.1

28.6

14.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

28.6

7

8

ASHA

50.7

36.8

29.6

30.3

7.2

4.6

3.3

6.6

4.6

152

159

ANM

59.2

35.7

26.5

19.4

5.1

8.2

2.0

2.0

1.0

98

101

MO/Chief MO/Doctor

55.0

45.0

45.0

20.0

10.0

10.0

5.0

5.0

0.0

20

22

GNM/SN

63.6

31.8

18.2

4.5

4.5

4.5

13.6

4.5

0.0

22

24

Gynecologist

76.9

46.2

23.1

0.0

7.7

0.0

15.4

0.0

0.0

13

13

CS/DPC

100.0

50.0

25.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

37.5

0.0

0.0

8

8

Number

191

125

94

76

23

19

16

14

10

329

344

Percent^^

58.1

38

28.6

23.1

7.0

5.8

4.9

4.3

3.0

[i] ^^Total of the percentages are more than 100 because of multiple choice questions.

Table 8 shows various suggestions for increasing the acceptance of PPIUCD as perceived by healthcare personnel in Bihar. Out of 329 personnel who have given response, 58.1% suggested that PPIUCD usage can be increased by increasing counselling at the time of delivery, since ANC along with that of family members followed by awareness and publicity (38%), Training of healthcare provider (28.6%) and providing incentives to beneficiaries (23.1%) and health care providers (7%). Regular post-operative check up and care and, free post-operative care in case of complications, were recommended by 4.3% and 3% respondents respectively.

Discussion

One-third of maternal mortality and 10% of child mortality can be decreased if the spacing between the two pregnancies is more than 2 years1 and PPIUCD is the way to go for achieving spacing in a reversible fashion. Women preferred this method due to sufficiently long duration4, 13, 16, 18, 19, 26 of action for meant for spacing between births as per some studies. Many studies suggested that women being motivated and being aware with the use of proper counselling was a major reason for acceptance of this method.4, 8, 14, 28, 6, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 A few other studies showed that women were more accepting of this method because of its safety and efficacy,14, 7, 13, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 and some preferred it due to availability of trained service providers.6, 11, 12, 23 In this study, women who were currently using PPIUCD were satisfied with the method due to its safety, efficacy, reversibility, husband’s approval, long duration of action, awareness, incentivization and proper training to ASHAs/ANMs. Women who never used PPIUCD that they would have used the method more if they were more aware and informed about the method, received incentives and service providers were well trained (ASHA, ANM, etc.). One of the studies showed that awareness of PPIUCD was low despite good education, which resulted in higher refusal rates.1 Few studies showed that counselling during ANC visits, especially of spouse and family members went a long way in acceptance of this method 9, 10, 13, 16, 24, 25 as imparting this knowledge to the mother in laws was as important as to the husband. 1 During our study, the health personnel believed the major reasons for acceptance to be spacing, counselling, safety, awareness, literacy, convenience, long duration of action and incentives.

Most studies regarding barriers in PPIUCD use show that most common reason for non-acceptance of PPIUCD were disapproval or lack of support from Husband/Family members1, 4, 8, 9 which can be attributed to lack of awareness,2, 8, 9, 27 inappropriate counseling1 and sometimes, illiteracy.2 As per our study, women who never used PPIUCD as their preferred method of family planning were discouraged from using this method due to husband/family’s disapproval, lack of awareness along with fear or misconceptions regarding the health side effects. Few other studies suggested that health issues/side effects15, 26 along with fear of complications4, 8, 24, 25 is a hindrance in accepting PPIUCD. A few other studies showed preference of another method6 and social and religious taboos2 to be barriers in acceptance of PPIUCD as a method of contraception. In our study, we found that some of the major barriers observed were health problems or side effects, husband/family’s disapproval, preference of another method, lack of awareness and fear or misconceptions among those who discontinued the use of PPIUCD.

Health promotion by community mobilizers like ASHAs, ANMs and Anganwadi workers4, 8, 14, 28, 6, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 in addition to using mass media for advertisement29 of the method will be most helpful in removing any kind of fears or misconceptions in terms of the safety, health issues or side effects regarding the method, thereby increasing the acceptance of PPIUCD. Comprehensive counseling during ANC visits to women and their families9, 10, 13, 16, 24, 25 as well as educational campaigns regarding PPIUCD are required to increase its acceptance.27 From this study, we conclude that counselling (in ANC visits, at the time of delivery and of Husband/Family members) about safety, efficacy and long duration of use of PPIUCD is required to address the issues of lack of awareness, rumors/misconceptions, cultural/religious barriers and husband/family’s disapproval. Regular follow up check-ups after the insertion of PPIUCD will lead to early diagnosis of complications or health issues. Promoting of PPIUCD by the healthcare providers and through media will address the issue of preferring another method over PPIUCD. Service providers should be well trained and equipped for insertion procedure, managing complications well and providing complete information will help in maintaining faith of users in them. Increasing the literacy rate will also improve the acceptance of PPIUCD. As pointed by women during FGDs, awareness campaign and publicity should be done to reach out the large number of potential users.

Author Contribution

BSS: Concept formulation, Funding acquisition, investigation, project administration, protocol writing, manuscript writing, Full text appraisal

DS: Concept formulation, Funding acquisition, protocol writing, Full text appraisal JK: Data curation, Literature Search, analysis, manuscript writing

Source of Funding

Funds were provided by Indian Council for Medical Research (ICMR) and Indian Council for Social Science Research (ICSSR) for undertaking this research under the joint Research Programme.

Conflicts of Interest

None

Acknowledgement

Authors acknowledge State Health Society, Bihar for allowing us to conduct this study. Authors also thanks all the respondents i.e Women, ASHA, ANM, FP Counsellors, Medical Officers and Nursing Staff interviewed.

References

1 

A Nigam A Ahmad A Sharma P Saith S Batra Postpartum Intrauterine Device Refusal in Delhi: Reasons AnalyzedJ Obstet Gynecol India201868320813

2 

N Gupta R Sinha A Mangal Knowledge, attitude and practice study on immediate postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device method of family planningInt J Community Med Public Health2017482981

3 

Annual Report 2018-19. MoHFW Accessed March 3, 2020https://mohfw.gov.in/sites/default/files/06%20Chapter%2093AN2018-19.pdf

4 

AT Alukal RC Raveendran L George PPIUCD: awareness and reasons for non-acceptanceInt J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol201872582

5 

A Janwadkar GS Shekhawat Acceptance, perception, experience and satisfaction of the couple with postpartum intrauterine contraceptive devices (PPIUCD) insertionAsian Pac J Health Sci2016345564

6 

T Sinha A Comparative Observational Study of Postpartum Intra-Uterine Contraceptive Device Insertions In A Sub Divisional Hospital and Medical College of BiharJ Evol Med Dent Sci201875254975500

7 

N Garg S Grover B Kaur Postpartum IUCD: its acceptance and complicationsInt J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol20176729737

8 

S Yadav R Joshi M Solanki Knowledge attitude practice and acceptance of postpartum intrauterine devices among postpartal women in a tertiary care centerInt J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol201764150710

9 

H Divakar A Bhardwaj CN Purandare T Sequeira P Sanghvi Critical Factors Influencing the Acceptability of Post-placental Insertion of Intrauterine Contraceptive Device: A Study in Six Public/Private Institutes in IndiaJ Obstet Gynecol India20196943449

10 

AK Nayak MK Jain Experience on Awareness, Acceptability, Safety, Efficacy, Complications and Expulsion of Post-partum Intrauterine Contraceptive Device InsertionInt J Sci Study20175120712

11 

P Malathi K Patalay Intra Cesarean - Intra Uterine Contraceptive Device 380 A Insertion: 3 years Experience at a Tertiary Care CenterInt Arch Integr Med2016382417

12 

M Yadav K Yadav S Choudhary A Sharma Clinical Study of Acceptability And Safety of Postpartum Intrauterine Contraceptive DevicesIOSR J Dent Med Sci20161583842

13 

R Chethan GS Anitha C Savitha Study on post partum intrauterine contraceptive device practices and causes for discontinuation of PPIUCD at follow up in a tertiary hospitalInt J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol20187622992303

14 

S Deshpande S Gadappa K Yelikar N Wanjare S Andurkar Awareness, acceptability and clinical outcome of post-placental insertion of intrauterine contraceptive device in Marathwada region, India Indian J Obstet Gynecol Res2017417782

15 

MV Dhuda S G Bhatiya P Agarwal Y Lad A Study of Acceptance, Follow Up & Outcome Of Post Partum Intra Uterine DevicesInt J Sci Res20154324952

16 

A Sharma V Gupta A study of awareness and factors affecting acceptance of PPIUCD in South-East RajasthanInt J Community Med Public Health201748270610

17 

A Shanavas S Jacob N Chellamma Outcome of immediate postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device in caesarean versus vaginal insertion: a comparative studyInt J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol2017626949

18 

S Gupta S Trivedi R Biswas A comparative study of clinical outcomes of post placental insertion versus interval insertion of Copper T 380A intrauterine deviceInt J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol2015437659

19 

P Lal N Pandey A Singh A retrospective analysis on acceptability and complications of PPIUCD insertionInt J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol201871145369

20 

SS Gaur S Mendiratta Postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device: evaluation of acceptance and complicationsInt J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol201988321922

21 

R Hooda S Mann S Nanda A Gupta H More J Bhutani Immediate Postpartum Intrauterine Contraceptive Device Insertions in Caesarean and Vaginal Deliveries: A Comparative Study of Follow-Up OutcomesInt J Reprod Med2016201615

22 

M Poovathi P Sondararajan Immediate postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device insertion: a prospective follow up studyInt J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol20165619025

23 

K Kanmani G Gokulakrishnan RR Rani Acceptance of postplacental intrauterine contraceptive device: recent increase in trendInt J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol20165513414

24 

H Vansjaliya K Prajapati MC Shah N Parma Analysing Barriers In Acceptance of Postpartum Intrauterine Device (PPIUCD) At Tertiary Care Hospital of GujaratNatl J Integr Res Med201785912

25 

R Sinha R Prasad P Priya PPIUCD- Acceptance Analysis in Patna Medical College hospitalJ Med Sci Clin Res20197445962

26 

SS Bhat H Damle SP Darawade K Junnare M Ashturkar To study the acceptance of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device, CU T 380 A, in a tertiary care hospital in IndiaJ Reprod Health Med201622938

27 

MR Pradeep DH Nayana Study of knowledge, attitude and acceptance of PPIUCD in antenatal mothersNew Indian J Obgyn201961424

28 

S Xess M Sharma L Rajoria S Mehta A study to evaluate and compare the expulsion, removal and continuation of post placental insertion of Cu 375 and CuT 380A in Indian womenInt J Clin Obstet Gynaecol201821338

29 

HR Modugu R Panda T Liberhan A Bhanot Entertainment education shows for increased uptake of family planning services and improved health seeking behavior in rural IndiaDemography India20184728399



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Article type

Original Article


Article page

506-514


Authors Details

Bhanu Shanker Singh*, Dhananjay Srivastava, Jaswinder Kaur


Article History

Received : 26-06-2022

Accepted : 24-08-2022


Article Metrics


View Article As

 


Downlaod Files