Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research

Print ISSN: 2394-2746

Online ISSN: 2394-2754

CODEN : IJOGCS

Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research (IJOGR) open access, peer-reviewed quarterly journal publishing since 2014 and is published under auspices of the Innovative Education and Scientific Research Foundation (IESRF), aim to uplift researchers, scholars, academicians, and professionals in all academic and scientific disciplines. IESRF is dedicated to the transfer of technology and research by publishing scientific journals, research content, providing professional’s membership, and conducting conferences, seminars, and award more...

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article statistics

Viewed: 457

PDF Downloaded: 217


Get Permission Chudasama, Goti, Patel, and Prajapati: Role of TVS and MRI imaging in perimenopausal bleeding


Introduction

Abnormal uterine bleeding is any variation in the normal menstrual cycle, Includes: changes in frequency, duration and amount of blood loss during or in between the cycles.1

Approximately 70% of all gynecological consultations in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women are for abnormal uterine bleeding. There complaints may significantly affect the quality of life and lead to surgical intervention.2

Abnormal perimenopausal or postmenopausal bleeding is associated with endometrial carcinoma in approximately 10% of cases and is considered to be caused by endometrial neoplasia until proven otherwise.3, 4

Approximately 90% of women with endometrial carcinoma present with vaginal bleeding.

In 18% to 40% of women, benign focal lesions, such as endometrial polyps and fibroids, are common. Although PMB is most commonly due to other conditions, it is essential to exclude endometrial carcinoma.5

TVS is an inexpensive, non-invasive, easily available and a convenient method to assess the uterine pathology.

It is recommended as the 1st line diagnostic tool for assessing uterine pathology in perimenopausal age women presenting with abnormal uterine bleeding.2, 4

Drawbacks include- limited field of view, obscuration of pelvis by bowel gas and its dependence on the skill expertise.6

In the pelvis, MRI appears to have a 91-93% overall precision for characterising benign and malignant lesions particularly when contrast techniques are used.5, 7, 8

Magnetic resonance imaging because of its high resolution and multi planar imaging and its capability to characterize multiple lesions is becoming the modality of choice to assess the pathologies of pelvis.9

Classification of lesions10

  1. Lesions of myometrium - Leiomyoma and adenomyosis.

  2. Lesions of endometrium - Endometrial polyp, endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial carcinoma.

  3. Lesions of cervix - Cervical carcinoma, cervicitis.

  4. Adnexal lesions - Hydrosalpinx, hematosalpinx, pyosalpinx, simple. ovarian cysts, hemorrhagic ovarian cyst, endometriotic cysts and dermoid cysts.

Aims and Objectives

  1. To differentiate and characterize uterine and ovarian lesions based on MRI and TVS findings.

  2. To identify organ of origin of uterine and ovarian lesions based on MRI and TVS findings.

  3. To diagnose abnormalities which have a difficulty in detection with TVS.

Materials and Methods

Study design

Prospective case control study.

Sample size

40 patients in perimenopausal age group with complain of abnormal uterine bleeding attending OPD at C.U. Shah medical college and hospital.

  1. All patients were subjected to TVS and MRI examination.

  2. Final correlation with histopathology was done wherever it was acquired.

  3. TVS was performed on Affinity Philips 70G transvaginal transducer.

  4. Magnetic resonance imaging of pelvis was performed with 1.5T SIEMENS machine.

  5. Clinical history was taken, TVS was done and the findings were noted.

  6. Informed consent was taken from all patients & MRI was done using standard protocol.

  7. All patients were followed up when it was possible.

  8. Histopathology reports were collected when necessary from patients who underwent surgery or biopsy.

Exclusion criteria

  1. Patients of low socioeconomic status who didn’t agree to be a part of study.

  2. Patients who had claustrophobia (afraid of closed spaces).

  3. Patients inculcated with metallic bioimplants and grafts.

  4. Unmarried women were not considered for TVS.

Result

Among 40 females, majority of them were in pre menopause period 25 (62.5%) and the rest in the post menopause period 15 (37.5%).

Table 1

Distribution of pre and post menopause study participants

Frequency

Percent

Pre menopause

25

62.5

Post menopause

15

37.5

Total

40

100

Among 40, majority were diagnose fibroids 14 (37.5%), adnexal lesions 11 (27.5%), carcinoma of cervix 5 (12.5%), endometrial lesions 6(12.5%) and adenomyosis 4 (10.0%).

Table 2

Distribution of cases

Number of Cases

Frequency

Percent

Fibroids

14

35.5

Adenomyosis

4

10.0

Carcinoma of cervix

5

12.5

Adnexal lesions

11

27.5

Endometrial lesions

6

15

Total

40

100

Table 2 describes that adnexal lesions start in early age itself (35±2). Endometrial lesions (51±8) and carcinoma of cervix (55±6) were reported mostly in the post menopausal periods. Fibroids (40±5) and Adenomyosis (42±4) were reported in middle age.

Table 3

Comparision of Mean age with final diagnosis

Final diagnosis

Mean Age

Fibroids

40±5

Adenomyosis

42±4

Carcinoma of cervix

55±6

Adnexal lesions

35±2

Endometrial lesions

51±8

Table 3 describes that out of 4 cases TVS could detect only 2 as Adenomyosis and other 2 were? Adenomyosis.

This explains that there is significant difference in diagnosing adenomyosis using TVS and MRI.

Table 4

Comparison of TVS findings with MRI findings for Adenomyosis

TVS Diagnosis

MRI Diagnosis

Total

Adenomyosis

Adenomyosis with fibroid uterus

? Adenomyosis

2

0

2

? Adenomyosis with fibroid uterus

0

1

1

Adenomyosis

1

0

1

Total

3

1

4

Among 4 cases of adenomyosis MRI detect all (100%) where in TVS showed only 2 cases as positive.

  1. Sensitivity =50%

  2. Positive likelihood ratio = 0.5

  3. Sensitivity = 60%

  4. Positive predictive value (PPV) = 60%

  5. Positive likelihood ratio = 0.9

Out of 8 cases TVS picked up 3 cases as positives were as HPE picked up all 5 cases of ca cervix. The true positives were 3 and true negatives were 1, there were 2 false negative and 2 false positives by the diagnosing test. There is no significant association detected.

Table 5

Comparison of Ca Cervix diagnosed by TVS with HPE

Ca Cervix TVS

HPE

Present

Absent

Total

Present

3

2

5

Absent

2

1

3

Total

5

3

8

  1. Sensitivity 100%,

  2. PPV = 100%

Out of 8 samples MRI and HPE picked all 5 cases of ca cervix. The true positives were 5 and true negatives were 3. There is significant association detected.

Table 6

Comparison of Ca Cervix diagnosed by MRI with HPE

MRI

Ca Cervix HPE

Present

Absent

Total

Present

5

0

5

Absent

0

3

3

Total

5

3

8

Out of 16 samples TVS picked up 6 cases as positive whereas HPE picked 6 cases of Endometrial Lesions. The true positives were 4 and true negatives were 8, there were 2 false positives and 2 false negatives by the diagnosing test.

  1. Sensitivity = 66.6%

  2. Specificity = 80%

  3. Positive predictive value (PPV) = 66.6%

  4. Negative predictive value (NPV) = 80%

Table 7

Comparision of endometrial lesions diagnosed by TVS with HPE

TVS

Endo Lesions HPE

Present

Absent

Total

Present

4

2

6

Absent

2

8

10

Total

6

10

16

Table 8

Comparison of endometrial lesions diagnosed by MRI with HPE

MRI

Endo Lesions HPE

Present

Absent

Total

Present

5

1

6

Absent

1

9

10

Total

6

10

16

Out of 16 samples MRI picked up 5 cases as positive whereas HPE picked 6 cases of endometrial lesions. The true positives were 5 and true negatives were 9, there were 1 false positive and 1 false negative by the diagnosing test.

  1. Sensitivity = 83.3%

  2. Specificity = 90%

  3. Positive predictive Value (PPV) = 83.3%

  4. Negative predictive value (NPV) = 90%

Table 9

Comparison of number of Fibroid by TVS and MRI

TVS

MRI

Single

Multiple

Single

6

3

Multiple

NIL

5

There is significant association between TVS and MRI.

  1. Sensitivity =100%

  2. Specificity = 62.5%

  3. Positive predictive value (PPV) = 66.6%

  4. Negative predictive value (NPV) =100%

Table 10

Comparison of frequency of diagnosis of adnexal lesions by TVS and MRI

TVS Diagnosis

Frequency

MRI Diagnosis

Frequency

Complex Adnexal Cysts

4

Complex Adnexal Cysts

3

Dermoid

3

Dermoid

3

Simple Ovarian Cysts

2

Simple Ovarian Cysts

2

Haemorrhagic Cyst

1

Haemorrhagic Cyst

2

Possibly Hydrosalphinx

1

Hydrosalphinx

1

There is significant association between TVS and MRI.

  1. Sensitivity =100%

  2. Positive predictive value (PPV) = 66.6%

Among 11 patients TVS diagnosed 4 as complex adnexal cysts, 3 as dermoid, 2 as simple ovarian Cyst, 1 as haemorrhagic cyst and 1 as possibly hydrosalphinx and MRI diagnosed 3 as complex adnexal cysts, 3 as dermoid, 2 as simple ovarian cysts, 2 as haemorrhagic cyst and 1 as hydrosalphinx.

Figure 1

T2 sagittal section of MRI pelvis shows hyperintense areas within the thickened junctional zone representing cystic changes of Adenomyosis

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/8d9ef781-f1d7-4592-9842-9257341f06d7image1.png

Figure 2

TVS image shows bulky uterus with loss of endometrial-myometrial differentiation

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/8d9ef781-f1d7-4592-9842-9257341f06d7image2.png

Figure 3

T2 sagittal section of MRI pelvis shows cystic lesion without internal septations in adnexa

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/8d9ef781-f1d7-4592-9842-9257341f06d7image3.png

Figure 4

TVS image shows simple cyst in adnexa

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/ce967142-9916-4137-bac0-f83809fc3ca8/image/cb31b2df-421b-49eb-9b14-fa29011993a6-uimage.png

Figure 5

T2 sagittal section of MRI shows ovoid hypointense polyp in the endometrial cavity

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/8d9ef781-f1d7-4592-9842-9257341f06d7image5.png

Figure 6

TVS image shows thickened endometrium

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/ce967142-9916-4137-bac0-f83809fc3ca8/image/481c1048-af32-4fe6-ab63-e8bbd6ae99a7-uimage.png

Figure 7

TVS image shows endometrial carcinoma

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/ce967142-9916-4137-bac0-f83809fc3ca8/image/b546bc1c-982d-4c26-ae50-71a0507f914c-uimage.png

Figure 8

MRI image shows endometrial carcinoma

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/ce967142-9916-4137-bac0-f83809fc3ca8/image/efa87024-f920-4233-ab4f-495590070f0e-uimage.png

Conclusions

Abnormal uterine bleeding is a common symptom in perimenopausal women. Accurate diagnosis is essential to rule out benign or malignant conditions and provide the most appropriate treatment.2, 4

To characterize, localize and evaluate the number of lesions both benign and malignant along with its staging in pelvic pathologies, MRI is found to be more precise and many a times gold standard in comparison to ultrasound.6, 11

In cases of adenomyosis, MRI turned out to be more accurate in its diagnosis where as ultrasound was found indeterminate in visualizing the junctional zone.12, 13

In cases of fibroids in aiding their number and location, MRI turned out to be more superior than transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound. In endometrial lesions, TVS can be used as a great screening tool. MRI was found to be crucial in determining myometrial invasion.14

Extent of carcinoma cervix and its invasion to adjacent viscera was found to be superior in MRI compared to ultrasound.

In the adnexa lesions, characterization and differentiation of various types of lesions, TVS was less specific in contrast to MRI.

Finally, we conclude that TVS lacks specificity and sensitivity in relation to MRI but acts as a better screening tool in evaluation and further management as it is cost effective, easily available and less time consuming. MRI is accordingly a more precise preoperative imaging modality for portraying and distinguishing the distinct features of varied lesions.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1 

A Saini R Dina GA Mcindoe W P Soutter P Gishen NM deSouza Characterization of adnexal masses with MRIAJR Am J Roentgenol2005184310049

2 

LB Schwartz E Panageas R Lange Female pelvis: Impact of MR imaging on treatment decisions and net cost analysisRadiology199419215560

3 

ACR practice guideline for the performance of pelvic ultrasound in females2006American College of RadiologyReston, VA

4 

VG Padubidri S Daftary Shaw's Textbook of Gynecology16th EdElsevierNetherlands2014

5 

CL Bailey FR Ueland GL Land PD DePriest HH Gallion R J Kryscio The malignant potential of cystic ovarian tumors in women over 50 years of ageGynecol Oncol199869137

6 

J Kochiyil V Jeevan Utility of MRI in uterine and adnexal lesionsInt J Med Res20164465563

7 

E Murase ES Siegelman EK Outwater LA Perez-Jaffe RW Tureck Uterine leiomyomas: histopathologic features, MR imaging findings, differential diagnosis, and treatmentRadiographics1999195117997

8 

N Smorgick R Maymon Assessment of adnexal masses using ultrasound: a practical reviewInt J Womens Health2014685763

9 

M Bazot A Cortez E Darai J Rouger J Chopier JM Antoine Ultrasonography compared with magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathologyHum Reprod20011611242733

10 

J Devimeenal DS Arun Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), transabdominal ultrasound (TAS), transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) in characterizing the uterine mass lesionsJ Dent Med Sci20171626574

11 

ED Levens R Wesley A Premkumar W Blocker LK Nieman Magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasound for determining fibroid burden: implications for research and clinical careAm J Obstet Gynecol20092005537

12 

S Adusumilli HK Hussain EM Caoili WJ Weadock JP Murray TD Johnson MRI of sonographically indeterminate adnexal massesAm J Roentgenol2006187373240

13 

AF Haggerty AR Hagemann C Chu ES Siegelman SC Rubin Correlation of pelvic magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis with pathology for indeterminate adnexal massesInt J Gynecol Cancer2014247121521

14 

LM Scoutt SM Mccarthy R Lange A Bourque PE Schwartz MR evaluation of clinically suspected adnexal massesJ Comput Assist Tomogr199418460918



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Article type

Original Article


Article page

522-527


Authors Details

Nirmala C Chudasama, Jaykumar D Goti*, Kinjalben R Patel, Bhagyesh V Prajapati


Article History

Received : 15-09-2022

Accepted : 20-09-2022


Article Metrics


View Article As

 


Downlaod Files