Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research

Print ISSN: 2394-2746

Online ISSN: 2394-2754

CODEN : IJOGCS

Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research (IJOGR) open access, peer-reviewed quarterly journal publishing since 2014 and is published under auspices of the Innovative Education and Scientific Research Foundation (IESRF), aim to uplift researchers, scholars, academicians, and professionals in all academic and scientific disciplines. IESRF is dedicated to the transfer of technology and research by publishing scientific journals, research content, providing professional’s membership, and conducting conferences, seminars, and award more...

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article statistics

Viewed: 674

PDF Downloaded: 375


Get Permission Battu, Tatikunta, and Rameshwaram: A clinical analysis of ectopic pregnancies in a tertiary care centre: A one year retrospective study


Introduction

An ectopic pregnancy occurs when a fertilized ovum implants outside normal uterine cavity.

The cardinal rule in the evaluation of early pregnancies with bleeding, especially in early 1st trimester, is to have a high index of suspicion for an ectopic pregnancy.2

Over 95% of ectopic pregnancies occur in fallopian tube’s various segments. The ampulla [70%] is most frequent site followed by isthmus[12%], fimbrial[11%], interstitial[2%].1

Non tubal ectopic pregnancies comprise the remaining 5% and implant in ovary, peritoneal cavity, cervix, prior cesarean scar.1

Ocassionally, a multifetal pregnancy contains one conceptus with normal uterine implantation and the other implanted ectopically-Heterotopic pregnancy. 1

The classic triad of ectopic pregnancy is Amenorrhoea that is followed by Abdominal pain and Vaginal bleeding.

‘When in doubt, do it’ was indeed standard teaching in the management of ectopic pregnancy until the development and easy availability of serum beta-hcg testing, transvaginal ultrasound and laparoscopy. With highly sensitive urine pregnancy tests, if the test is positive and the uterus is empty on ultrasound, a diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy should be made unless proved otherwise.3

Because of the ready availability of both pregnancy test and the ultrasound, a number of ectopic pregnancies are now diagnosed even before any symptoms occur or at a very early stage with mild bleeding and discomfort and stable haemodynamic condition. This has opened up the possibility of treating ectopic pregnancies medically without the need for surgery.3

Ultrasound criteria of an ectopic gestation include failure to visualise an intrauterine pregnancy at a serum beta-hCG level greater than 1500 units, visualisation of an extrauterine gestation sac with or without a living embryo, a nonspecific, variably vascular, variably tender adnexal mass and free fluid in the pelvis.3

Aim of the Study

To study and analyse ectopic pregnancies in a tertiary care centre in one year.

Objectives

To determine the

  1. Incidence

  2. Risk factors

  3. Clinical presentation

  4. Management

  5. Morbidity and Mortality of ectopic pregnancy.

Materials and Methods

Retrospective analysis of ectopic pregnancy was done in Gandhi hospital, Secunderabad from October 2021 to September 2022{1 year duration} with a sample of 97 cases of suspected ectopic pregnancy observed and treated, out of total 11252 pregnant women admitted, are included in this study.

Age, parity, risk factors, clinical features, ultrasonography findings, mode of management, need for blood transfusions were noted.

Main outcome measures studied were incidence, risk factors, clinical presentation, management, morbidity and mortality.

Results

During the study period of 1 year, there were 11252 pregnant women admitted in the hospital and out of 97 suspected ectopic pregnancies 90 cases were found to have ectopic pregnancy giving the incidence of 0.8%(8 per 1000 pregnancies). 4 cases were found to have ovarian cyst, 1 case was found to have ovarian torsion and 2 cases were found to have negative laparotomy.

Table 1

Age of study population

Age (yrs)

Number

Percentage

<20

4

4.1%

20-25

42

43.2%

26-30

43

44.3%

>30

8

8.2%

Majority of the patients (87 5% belonged to the age group of 20-30years.

Table 2

Gravidity

Gravidity

Number

Percentage

PRIMI

22

22.6%

2nd

27

27.8%

3rd

28

28.8%

4th

21

21.6%

In this study 77.4% were multigravida and 22.6% were Primigravida.

Table 3

Risk factors

Risk factors

Number

Percentage

Multiparity

49

50.5%

Tubal sterilisation

7

7.2%

Infertility Treatment

12

12.3%

H/O pelvic infection

4

4.1%

No risk factors

25

25.7%

In present study multiparity (50.5%) appears to be a most common risk factor.

Table 4

Mode of presentation

Presentation

Number

Percentage

Amenorrhoea

81

83.5%

Pain abdomen

97

100%

Bleeding PV

67

69%

In the present study the triad of amenorrhoea, pain abdomen, bleeding pv was seen in 69% of cases.

Table 5

Correlation between UPT, ultrasonography findings and laparotomy findings

No.

UPT

Ultrasonography findings

Laparotomy findings

1

Positive

Left tubal ectopic pregnancy with minimal fluid in POD

Left ovarian ecotopic gestation of 7*5 cms (confirmed by HPE) with 100ml haemoperitoneum

2

Positive

Right tubal ruptured ectopic pregnancy with moderate haemoperitoneum

Right ovarian ectopic (confirmed by HPE)+500ml blood loss+250gms clots.

3

Weakly positive

? right unruptured ectopic pregnancy

Right ovarian simple cyst of 4*3 cms

4

Weakly positive

?left unruptured ectopic pregnancy

Left ovarian simple cyst of 3*3 cms

5

Positive

?right tubal ectopic?right haemorrhagic ovarian cyst? corpus luteal cyst

Left ovary and tube normal, right ruptured haemorrhagic ovarian cyst, 150ml haemoperitoneum

6

Positive

?left tubal ruptured ectopic pregnancy ?left haemorrhagic ovarian cyst

Left haemorrhagic ovarian cyst, 200ml haemoperitoneum

7

Weakly positive

?right ruptured ectopic pregnancy

Right ovary was enlarged and cystic, left ovary was normal, right and left tubes were normal

8

Positive

?right ruptured ectopic pregnancy

B/L ovaries and tubes were normal

9

Positive

? right tubal ectopic pregnancy ?right haemorrhagic ovarian cyst

Right ovary and tube were gangrenous with ovarian ligament and infundibulopelvic ligament twisted around fallopian tube 3 times

Out of 96 cases managed surgically, ultrasonography findings of 87(90.6%) cases correlated with laparotomy findings. In remaining 9(9.3%) cases there was a disparity between ultrasonography and laparotomy findings (Table 5).

UPT was positive in all ectopic pregnancies.

False positive UPT was observed in 7 cases.

Table 6

Haemoglobin at presentation vs site of copic haemoglobin

Site of ectopic

>11gm%

9-10.9gm%

7-8.9gm%

4-6.9gm%

<4gm%

P-value

Cornua (13)

1(7.8%)

3(23%)

6(46.2%)

3(23%)

-

0.68

Isthmus (2)

-

1(50%)

-

1(50%)

-

Ampulla (57)

10(17.5%)

27(47.3%)

10(17.5%)

9(15.7%)

1(1.7%)

Fimbria (12)

3(25%)

3(25%)

4(33.3%)

2(16.7%)

-

Ovary (4)

-

1(25%)

3(75%)

-

-

Heterotopic (2)

-

1(50%)

1(50%)

-

-

50%(1) cases of isthmic ectopic pregnancies, 30.7%(5) cases of cornual ectopic pregnancies, 26.6%(4) cases of fimbrial ectopic pregnancies, 20.7%(11) cases of ampullary ectopic pregnancies were presented with severe anaemia. P-value for the (Table 6) comparision is 0.68 which is statistically non significant.

Table 7

Intraoperative findings (Out of 97 suspected cases 96 managed surgically

Intraoperative findings

No. of cases

Percentage

Ectopic Pregnancies

89

92.7%

Haemorrhagic ovarian cyst/ Simple ovarian cyst

4

4.2%

Ovarian torsion

1

1.04%

Negative laparotomy

2

2.08%

Among 97 suspected ectopic pregnancies, intraoperatively, 89(92.7%) cases were found to have ectopic pregnancies, 4(4.2%) cases were found to have simple or haemorrhagic ovarian cyst, 1(1.04%) case was found to have ovarian torsion, 2(2.08%) cases were found to have negative laparotomy.(Table 7)

Table 8

Site of ectopic pregnancy (89) (based on intraoperative findings)

Site of ectopic

Number

Percentage

Ampulla

56

62.9%

Fimbria

12

13.4%

Cornua

13

14.6%

Isthmus

2

2.2%

Ovary

4

4.4%

Heterotopic

2

2.2%

In present study ampulla is the common site of ectopic (62.9%).(Table 8)

Table 9

Laparotomy findings in tubal ectopic pregnancies (86)

Condition of tube

No

%

Ruptured

68

79%

Unruptured

18

21%

In present study ruptured tubal ectopic pregnancies were found in 79% of cases and unruptured tubal ectopic pregnancies in 21% of cases.(Table 9)

Table 10

Site of ectopic vs average blood loss

Site of ectopic

Upto 750ml

750ml-1500ml

1500ml-2000ml

>2000ml

P-value

Cornua (13)

7(53.9%)

2(15.4%)

3(23%)

1(7.7%)

0.46

Isthmus (2)

1(50%)

-

1(50%)

-

Ampulla (56)

41(73.2%)

9(16%)

5(8.9%)

1(1.7%)

Fimbrial (12)

8(66.6%)

2(16.6%)

1(8.3%)

1(8.3%)

Ovarian (4)

3(75%)

1(25%)

-

-

Heterotopic (2)

2(100%)

-

-

-

In present study, >750ml blood loss (class II, III, IV haemorrhagic shock) was seen in 50% cases of isthmic ectopic pregnancies, 46.7% cases of cornual ectopic pregnancies, 33.4% cases of fimbrial ectopic pregnancies, 26.7% cases of ampullary ectopic pregnancies, 25% cases of ovarian ectopic pregnancies.(Table 10)

P-value for the Table 10 comparision is 0.46 which is statistically non significant.

Table 11

Surgical procedure done (96)

Procedure

No.

%

U/L salpingectomy

61

63.5%

U/L salpingo-oophorectomy

3

3.1%

U/L salpingectomy +R/L tubectomy

23

23.9%

B/L salpingectomy

1

1.04%

R/L oophorectomy

2

2.08%

R/L ovarian cystectomy

4

4.2%

Negative laparotomy

2

2.08%

Most common procedure done was unilateral salpingectomy (63.5%) one case was managed medically and successfully with single dose methotrexate.(Table 11)

Table 12

Morbidity and mortality associated with ectopic pregnancy

Blood Transfusion

65.9%(64)

Post-op wound complications

3.1%(3)

Mortality

0

In present study incidence of blood transfusion, postop wound complications was noted in 65.9%, 3.1% cases respectively. Mortality was zero in this study.(Table 12)

Discussion

In the present study, majority of the women belonged to the age group of 20-30 years (87.5%) which is close to the studies done by Samiya Multi et al (75.4%),4 Panchal D et al (71.66%),5 Gaddagi et al (70.2),6 Sudha et al study (67.54%),7 Chate, et al study(70.96%).8

We observed maximum incidence of Ectopic pregnancy was in multigravida i.e, 77.4% followed by primigravida i.e.22.6%. This correlates with the studies done by Shraddha Shetty K et al. (83.9),9 Panchal D et al(81.66%)5 Poonam et al. (83.6%),10 Sudha, et al i.e.(82%).7

In present study, abdominal pain was present in 100% cases and amenorrhoea in 83.5% cases and bleeding pervaginum in 69% cases.Shetty S et al9 observed the commonest symptoms were abdominal pain (80.6%), amenorrhoea (77.4%) and vaginal bleeding (61.3%) Gaddagi et al6 observed that a majority of the cases presented with pain abdomen (89.2%), amenorrhoea (75.7%), spotting pv in 43.2%. Chate et al8 study observed pain abdomen in 92.47% cases and amenorrhoea in 77.4% cases and bleeding pv in 58% cases. Sudha et al7 observed amenorrhoea in 82.4% cases, pain abdomen in 78.5% cases bleeding pv in 63.3% cases.

Urine pregnancy test was positive in 92.7% of the cases which correlated with the study done by Sudha et al,7 Rashmi A Gaddagi, et al(97.3%)6 and WM Fgeeh(96%).11

In present study, 12.3% of women with ectopic pregnancy were infertile which is correlating with the studies done by Panchal D, et al (11.66%),5 Samiya Mufti, et al (8.77%),4 Sudha et al(7.01%),7 Chate et al(20.43%).8

In present study group, 7.2% of the women with ectopic pregnancy had tubal sterilization which correlates with the studies done by Uzmashabab, et al (5%),12 Shrestha et al. (5%),13 Sudha et al(6.57%),7 Chate et al (23.65%).8

In 95.5% cases ectopic pregnancy was tubal. Commonest site for ectopic pregnancy was ampulla in present study accounting for 62.9% cases followed by cornua and fimbria in 14.6% and 13.4% cases respectively. Similarly, reported in Chate et al8 study i.e. ampulla in 51.61%, fimbria in 19.3%.

Sudha et al7 reported ampullary pregnancies in 63.15% cases, cornual in 13.15% cases fimbrial in 16% cases.

In the present study, the incidence of rupture ectopic was 79% cases, followed by unruptured ectopic pregnancies in 21% cases. Similarly, reported in Chate et al8 study i.e. ruptured ectopic 76.35%. Gaddadi R et al6 reported that 78.3% cases showed a ruptured ectopic pregnancy on laparotomy. Sudha et al7 reported that ruptured ectopic was present in 66.66% cases on laparotomy.

In present study right sided ectopic pregnancies (58.1%) were more than left sided ectopic pregnancies (41.9%). In Sudha et al7 study right sided tubal pregnancy was present in 64% cases and left tubal involvement in 36% cases.

In present study, more than 750ml blood loss was observed in 30.3% cases of ectopic pregnancies.

In the present study, unilateral salpingectomy was done in 63.5% cases. In Sudha et al7 study it was 90%, in Chate et al8 study it was 75.2%. Shetty et al9 observed the most common surgery done was unilateral salpingectomy in 90.3% cases.

In present study, ruptured haemorrhagic ovarian cysts were found in 2 cases, simple ovarian cyst was found in 2 cases, 1 case was found to have ovarian torsion and 2 cases had negative laparotomy.

Medical management was done in 1 case successfully with single dose Methotrexate.

Morbidity included anaemia, blood transfusion and wound infection.

In the present study Maternal mortality rate is zero consistent with Sudha et al7 study and A, Abbas and H. Akram study.14

Conclusion

Clinicians should be aware of the fact that any women in reproductive age group presenting with pain in lower abdomen or vaginal bleeding, ectopic pregnancy should be suspected irrespective of presence or absence of amenorrhoea, whether or not she has undergone sterilization, because early diagnosis is critical in reducing maternal morbidity and mortality and improving treatment success rates.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1 

F Cunningham KJ Lenovo JS Dashe BL Hoffman CY Spong Williams Obstetrics26th edMcGraw-Hill Education2022

2 

A Bhide SS Arulkumaran KR Damania SN Daftary Arias’ Practical Guide to High-Risk Pregnancy and Delivery: A South Asian Perspective5th EdElsevierIndia2019

3 

R Misra Ian Donald’s Practical Obstetrics Problems8th edWolters KluwerGurugram, India2020

4 

SM Shagufta M Samina AR Reyaz K Wasiqa Ectopic pregnancy; an analysis of 114 casesJK Pract201244203

5 

D Panchal G Vasihanav K Solanki Study of Management inpatient with Ectopic pregnancyNatl J Integr Res Med201123915

6 

RA Gaddagi AP Chandrashekbar A Clinical Study of Ectopic pregnancyJ Clin Diagn Res201268679

7 

VS Sudha RT Delphine A retrospective study on ectopic pregnancy: a two year studyInt J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol2016543658

8 

MT Chate B Chate K Chate Clinical study of ectopic pregnancyInt J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol20176834983501

9 

S Shetty A Shetty A clinical study of Ecoptic pregnancies in a Tertiary care hospital of Mangalore, IndiaInnov J Med Health Sci2014413059

10 

Y Poonam D Uprety B Banerjee Ectipic Pregnancy-two years review from BPKHIS, NepalKathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ)2005343659

11 

WM Fageeh Diagnosis and Management of Ectopic Pregnancy in King Abdulaziz University Hospital: A Four Year ExperienceJ King Abdulaziz University-Med Sci20081521525

12 

U Shabab HA Hasmi Different Pattern of Presentation of Ectopic Pregnancy and its ManagementJ Surg Pak20131813740

13 

J Shrestha R Saha Comparison of lapoarscopy and laparotomy in the surgical management of ecotopic pregnancyJ Coll Physicians Surg Pak201222127604

14 

A Abbas H Akram Ectopic pregnancy: Audit at Maula Bakhsh Teaching Hospital SargodhaProf Med J2011181247



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Article type

Original Article


Article page

105-109


Authors Details

Gangajamuna Battu*, Vijayakrishna Tatikunta, Priyadarshini Rameshwaram


Article History

Received : 24-11-2022

Accepted : 09-12-2022


Article Metrics


View Article As

 


Downlaod Files