Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research

Print ISSN: 2394-2746

Online ISSN: 2394-2754

CODEN : IJOGCS

Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research (IJOGR) open access, peer-reviewed quarterly journal publishing since 2014 and is published under auspices of the Innovative Education and Scientific Research Foundation (IESRF), aim to uplift researchers, scholars, academicians, and professionals in all academic and scientific disciplines. IESRF is dedicated to the transfer of technology and research by publishing scientific journals, research content, providing professional’s membership, and conducting conferences, seminars, and award more...

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article statistics

Viewed: 482

PDF Downloaded: 211


Get Permission Kondapalli: Efficacy of tablet metronidazole and clindamycin in management of bacterial vaginosis in a tertiary care hospital in Chengalpattu district


Introduction

BV is a common disorder, yet poorly understood poly-microbial vaginal infection.1 It is more commonly seen in women in reproductive age group. It has high prevalence in African women specially those in sub-Saharan Africa.1

Approximately 50-69% of women with BV are not symptomatic and women who presents with symptoms varies from Gray-white offensive vaginal discharge intensified after sexual intercourse and during menstruation, lower abdominal pain and dyspareunia. BV is diagnosed by two different criteria such as Amsel’s and Nugent’s.2

After the diagnosis according to the above criteria, CDC & ACOG recommended either orally or Intravaginally Metronidazole or Clindamycin is given to treat BV.3

In 2015 guidelines regarding sexually transmitted disease treatment, the CDC recommended BV treatment with a 7-days regimen of 500 mg of Tab. Metronidazole two times daily, a 5-days regimen of 0.75% Metronidazole gel administered intravaginally,4 and a 7-days regimen of 2% Clindamycin cream administered intravaginally was used.

Metronidazole provides excellent action against obligate anaerobes but is not effective against aerobes and facultative anerobes, while Clindamycin has broader spectrum of activity against the gram-positive aerobes and anaerobes.5

Materials and Methods

A Rrandomized control study was done after approval from Institute Ethical committee on patients who came to Gynaecology OPD in Shri Sathya Sai Medical College and Research Institute after taking written and informed consent.

All study subjects were examined in the OPD. Under aseptic precautions a High vaginal swab was taken and sent to microbiology lab for culture and sensitivity and using Amsel’s criteria and Nugent’s criteria diagnosis will be noted.

Amsel’s composite criteria include:6, 7

  1. If ph of vagina is > 4.5

  2. If clue cells are present in gram-stained vaginal discharge smears and

  3. If whiff test is positive.

  4. Characteristic Vaginal discharge.

  5. According to Amsel’s, if 3 of the 4 criteria are positive, the patient is diagnosed as Bacterial Vaginosis.

Nugent’s criteria6, 7

It evaluates three types of bacteria by Gram staining: Lactobacillus, Bacteroides and Mobilincus.

The study population is divided into 2 groups randomly Group-M Group-C, 33 each by computer generated list of random numbers using simple randomization technique. Patients were blinded to the study drug, treated and monitored by the Gynaecologists who were aware of the drug.

Informed consent was taken stating their commitment to take the drugs as given. Group ‘M’(Metronidazole) will be given Tab.Metronidazole 400mg TDS for seven days, while Group ‘C’ (Clindamycin) were given TAB.Clindamycin 300mg twice daily for seven days. The study subjects were followed up after two weeks of completion of treatment. Then, a vaginal swab is taken again for laboratory test, using Amsel’s criteria and Nugent’s criteria, those who turned negative were noted. Those who remained positive are recorded as the treatment failures and further management is done accordingly.

Statistics and analysis of data

Data was entered in MS-EXCEL and statistical analysis was done by SPSS 24 software. These results were presented in descriptive statistics and appropriate test of significance were applied with 5% level of significance and 95% confidence interval.

Results

Table 1

Symptoms before treatment among study participants

Symptoms

Metronidazole

Clindamycin

P value

Itching

Yes

22

21

0.82

No

11

12

LBA

Yes

6

5

0.84

No

27

28

Abdominal pain

Yes

13

12

0.83

No

20

21

Fever

Yes

3

2

0.76

No

30

31

The two groups are comparable with respect to symptoms before treatment among study participants.

Table 2

Symptoms after treatment among study participants

Symptoms

Metronidazole

Clindamycin

P value

Itching

Yes

11

10

0.76

No

22

23

LBA

Yes

2

1

0.68

No

31

32

Abdominal pain

Yes

6

7

0.64

No

27

26

Fever

Yes

2

2

1

No

31

31

Table 3

Amsel’s criteria after treatment

Criteria

Metronidazole

Clindamycin

P value

Positive

6

3

0.02

Negative

27

30

Total

33

33

Clindamycin is better than metronidazole with respect to amsels criteria after treatment (P<0.05).

Table 4

Nugent’s criteria after treatment

Criteria

Metronidazole

Clindamycin

P value

Positive

5

2

0.01

Negative

28

31

Total

33

33

Clindamycin is better than metronidazole with respect to nugents criteria after treatment (P<0.05).

Table 5

Culture results among study participants

Culture

Metronidazole

Clindamycin

P value

Sterile

25

30

0.04

Growth

8

3

Total

33

33

Clindamycin is better than metronidazole with respect to Culture results after treatment (P<0.05).

Discussion

The Centres for Diseases Control and Prevention and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (ACOG) both recommended Metronidazole and Clindamycin as the best available treatments for BV.8 Clinical trials comparing two different antimicrobial treatments found they were clinically equivalent,9 approving 50% recurrence rates after six months.10 Clindamycin has greater anti-gram-positive anaerobe and aerobe spectrum action, while Metronidazole is more effective against obligate anaerobes but less effective against aerobes and facultative.11

According to a 2013 comprehensive review, BV prevalence differs between and within nations around the world. Compared to women from West Africa (7% in Burkina Faso), women from South and East Africa had greater rates of BV (68% in Mozambique, 51% in Lesotho, 44% in Kenya, and 37% in Gambia). Women's BV rates are moderately high in Poland (19%), Norway (24%), and Turkey (23%). Women from Australia, New Zealand, Southeast Asia, and Indonesia usually have BV rates that are higher than 30%.12

A study similar to our study was done by D G Ferris et al. one week of oral Metronidazole 500 mg twice daily, five days of 0.75% Metronidazole vaginal gel, or seven days of 2% Clindamycin vaginal cream, were given to 100 women who had been diagnosed with bacterial vaginosis using conventional criteria.13, 14, 15 Women who also had vaginal trichomoniasis or vulvo-vaginal candidiasis were not included. For the treatment of bacterial vaginosis, oral metronidazole, metronidazole vaginal gel, and clindamycin vaginal cream all had approximately identical cure rates.16 Similar rates of post-treatment vulvo-vaginal candidiasis were observed in patients treated with these treatments, although those utilising the intra vaginal products expressed greater satisfaction with the course of treatment.17, 18, 19

Contrary to our study findings, W L Greaves et al.20 in their study of one of two treatments—T. Metronidazole 500 mg twice daily for seven days or Clindamycin 300 mg twice daily for seven days—was given to the 143 women who complained of vaginitis. Patients treated with Clindamycin (6.1%) and those treated with Metronidazole (4%), however, experienced the same failure rate.21, 22

Researchers Hantoushzadeh et al.23 (96.20%) and Raja et al. (93.86%) found the highest clinical cure rates for BV treatments similar to our study among women while examining who are pregnant and not pregnant women, respectively. One group of 250 pregnant women in Iran was given the probiotic treatment of eating mixed-lactobacilli yoghurt, while the other group was given the antibiotic treatment of eating Clindamycin orally (300 mg).

In our study comparing with The prevalence of bacterial vaginosis (BV) was found to be 23% in the study by Iieoma et al.24 which is consistent with other local investigations that found bacterial vaginosis prevalence among pregnant women to range from 17.3% to 64.3%. There are pronounced differences in prevalence between nations, races, and even groups living in the same nation.

Limitations

This study has certain limitations as it was done in a smaller population and in a rural setting without any bias. A larger sample is needed for accurate estimation of prevalence of Bacterial Vaginosis. The study population included women with Leucorrhoea. This study does not include women with pregnancy.25 Prospective long-term studies in a larger population will help comparison of both Treatment of bacterial vaginosis with metronidazole and clindamycin.20

Conclusion

Oral Clindamycin may be preferable to oral Metronidazole because of its broader spectrum of activity. We have proved in our study that Clindamycin is better than Metronidazole but more studies need to be conducted in future. These findings can be used to provide better treatment for the women with Bacterial Vaginosis. As the risk of Bacterial Vaginosis increases with multiple sexual partners and poor hygiene, adolescent girls and young women should be appropriately educated about avoidance of multiple sexual partners, use of barrier contraception and maintenance of proper personal hygiene.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1 

CC Ijeoma TK Nyengidiki G Bassey RN Ogu JO Alegbeleye Oral Clindamycin and Metronidazole in the treatment of bacterial vaginosis in pregnant black women: Comparison of efficacy and pregnancy outcomeClin J Obstet Gynaecol2020316

2 

AB Hodiwala A Koli Bacterial vaginosis (Review article)Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci201545308

3 

JIB Adinma NR Okwoli A Unaeze Agbai N Unaeze Prevalence of Gardnerella vaginalis in pregnant Nigerian womenAfr J Reprod Health20015505

4 

P Bennett Edmonds DK Preterm LabourDewhurst’s textbook of Obstetrics and Gynaecology8th EdWiley BlackwellWest Sussex201233855

5 

J Wristrom SR Noriby EB Myhrea S Ekrisson G Granstrom L Lagergren Frequency of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea in 2462 antibiotic-treated hospitalized patients: a prospective studyJ Antimicrob Chemother20014714350

6 

PS Rao S Devi A Shriyan M Rajaram K Jagdishchandra Diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis in the rural setup: comparison of clinical algorithm, smear scoring and culture by semiquantitative techniqueIndian J Med Microbiol20042214750

7 

KA Workowski GA Bolan Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelinesMMWR Recomm Rep201564RR-031137

8 

CS Bradshaw AN Morton J Hocking SM Garland MB Morris LM Moss High recurrence rates of bacterial vaginosis over the course of 12 months after oral metronidazole therapy and factors associated with recurrenceJ Infect Dis200619311147886

9 

RF Lamont JD Sobel RA Akins SS Hassan T Chaiworapongsa JP Kusanovic The vaginal microbiome: new information about genital tractBJOG2011118553349

10 

GGG Donders Definition and classification of abnormal vaginal floraBest Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol200721335573

11 

G G Donders A Vereecken G Salembier B Van Bulck B Spitz Assessment of vaginal lactobacillary flora in wet mount and fresh or delayed gram’s stainInfect Dis Obstet Gynecol1996426

12 

HL Gardner CD Dukes Haemophilus vaginalis vaginitis: a newly defined specific infection previously classified non-specific vaginitisAm J Obstet Gynecol195569596276

13 

RP Nugent MA Krohn SL Hillier Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretationJ Clin Microbiol1991292297301

14 

A Rubins G Gross SK Tyring Bacterial VaginosisTransmitted Infections and Sexually Transmitted Diseases SexuallySpringerBerlin20112036

15 

C Kenyon R Colebunders T Crucitti The global epidemiology of bacterial vaginosis: a systematic reviewAm J Obstet Gynecol2013209650523

16 

S Yen MA Shafer J Moncada CJ Campbell SD Flinn CB Boyer Bacterial vaginosis in sexually experienced and non-sexually experienced young women entering the militaryObstet Gynecol20031025 Pt 192733

17 

EH Koumans M Sternberg C Bruce G McQuillan J Kendrick M Sutton The prevalence of bacterial vaginosis in the United States, 2001-2004; associations with symptoms, sexual behaviors, and reproductive healthSex Transm Dis200734118649

18 

LA Vodstrcil ME Plummer CK Fairley G Tachedjian MG Law JS Hocking Combined oral contraceptive pill-exposure alone does not reduce the risk of bacterial vaginosis recurrence in a pilot randomised controlled trialSci Rep201991355510.1038/s41598-019-39879-8

19 

C Johnston A Magaret S Srinivasan S Proll D Varon J Marrazzo P239 Genital HSV-2 suppression is not associated with alterations in the vaginal microbiome: a one-way, cross-over studySex Transm Infect2019951A148

20 

WL Greaves J Chungafung B Morris A Haile JL Townsend Clindamycin versus metronidazole in the treatment of bacterial vaginosisObstet Gynecol1988725799802PMID

21 

SD Mehta Systematic review of randomized trials of treatment of male sexual partners for improved bacterial vaginosis outcomes in womenSex Transm Dis2012391082230

22 

P Bagnall D Rizzolo Bacterial vaginosis: A practical reviewJAAPA201730121521

23 

S Hantoushzadeh F Golshahi P Javadian S Khazardoost S Aram S Hashemi Comparative efficacy of probiotic yoghurt and clindamycin in treatment of bacterial vaginosis in pregnant women: A randomized clinical trialJ Matern Fetal Neonatal Med201225710214

24 

CC Ijeoma TK Nyengidiki G Bassey RN Ogu JO Alegbeleye Oral Clindamycin and Metronidazole in the treatment of bacterial vaginosis in pregnant black women: Comparison of efficacy and pregnancy outcomeClin J Obstet Gynaecol2020316

25 

DG Ferris MS Litaker L Woodward D Mathis J Hendrich Treatment of bacterial vaginosis: a comparison of oral metronidazole, metronidazole vaginal gel, and clindamycin vaginal creamJ Fam Pract19954154439



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Article type

Original Article


Article page

147-150


Authors Details

Saraswathi Kondapalli*


Article History

Received : 13-01-2023

Accepted : 09-02-2023


Article Metrics


View Article As

 


Downlaod Files