Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research

Print ISSN: 2394-2746

Online ISSN: 2394-2754

CODEN : IJOGCS

Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research (IJOGR) open access, peer-reviewed quarterly journal publishing since 2014 and is published under auspices of the Innovative Education and Scientific Research Foundation (IESRF), aim to uplift researchers, scholars, academicians, and professionals in all academic and scientific disciplines. IESRF is dedicated to the transfer of technology and research by publishing scientific journals, research content, providing professional’s membership, and conducting conferences, seminars, and award more...

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article statistics

Viewed: 447

PDF Downloaded: 227


Get Permission Mounika and Gopalan: Comparision of intravenous iron sucrose and intravenous ferric carboxymaltose for treatment of iron deficiency anemia in pregnant women: in a tertiary care hospital in Chengalpattu district


Introduction

Anaemia is one of the world’s leading causes of disability and it is one of the most serious public health hazards.1 Anaemia refers to a state wherein the level of haemoglobin in the blood is below the reference range appropriate for that particular age and sex.2

Nutritional anaemia being the most common variant worldwide, can be described as a disease syndrome caused by malnutrition.3 It is found more commonly among women of childbearing age, children and during pregnancy and lactation. Nearly two-thirds of pregnant and one-half of non-pregnant women from the developing countries are seen to be affected by some form of nutritional anaemia.4

The developed countries though less affected, are not completely free of anaemia, and a significant percentage of women of child-bearing age i.e. about 4-12% suffer from anemia.5 Globally, nutritional anaemia affects nearly half of pregnant women, with iron deficiency being recognized as the most common nutritional deficiency among women of childbearing age, in both developed and developing countries.1, 6 It is one of the major contributing factors in maternal morbidity and mortality in third world countries and according to the WHO, it contributes to 20% of the total maternal deaths.7

In India, about 20-40% of maternal deaths are due to anaemia. It is estimated that one in every two women in our country suffers from some form of anaemia.8 The prevalence of anaemia in pregnancy in India as per the National Family Health Survey (NFHS)-3 findings is 55.3%, with a prevalence of 57.4% and 50.9% in rural and urban areas respectively.9, 10, 11

The WHO proposes that “anaemia deficiency should be considered to exist” when the haemoglobin is below the following levels.12, 13

Table 1

Hb levels for anaemia

Age/sex

Hb-g/dl (venous blood)

MCHC (percent)

Adult males

13

34

Adult females (non-pregnant)

12

34

Adult females (pregnant)

11

34

Children, 6 months to 6 Years

11

34

Children, 6 to 14 years

12

34

The normal MCHC should be 34 irrespective of the age group, any value below being considered abnormal.14, 15

Methodology

A hospital-based, randomized, comparative study was conducted on all antenatal women attending Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shri Sathya Sai Medical College and Hospital were studied over 18 months. Based on the previous study14 the proportion of iron sucrose and ferric carboxymaltose groups are 86% and 14%, using 5% level of significance, 80% power. The total sample size is 100 antenatal women, 50 in each group. The Study was conducted after obtaining ethical clearance from IEC. Patients will be selected according to inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Inclusion criteria

All Antenatal women with iron deficiency anaemia with Hb 6-10gm and peripheral smear suggestive of iron deficiency anaemia.

  1. Gestational age 16-35 weeks.

  2. Age group between 18-35years.

Exclusion criteria

  1. History of parenteral iron intolerance

  2. Chronic Kidney disease

  3. Haematological disorder

  4. Vitamin B12 and folate deficiency

  5. Deep vein thrombosis, thrombocytosis

  6. Having Thalassemia or sickle cell disease

  7. H/o recent blood transfusion

The study protocol comprised the following activities:

  1. Screening

  2. Consent

  3. Measurement of pre-treatment Hemoglobin and calculation of total required dose of iron

  4. Randomization

  5. Administration of the Intervention

  6. Measurement of post-treatment (3 weeks Hemoglobin

Randomisation

Randomisation was done by computer-generated random numbers assigning patients to both groups-iron sucrose or iron carboxymaltose group.

Intervention

Ferric Carboxymaltose was given as per the total required dose in normal saline infusion as follows:

Iv drip infusion: Dilute in 0 9% sodium chloride / 500 to 1000mg: 250 ml NS - 15 min duration

Not exceeding the maximum dose of 1000 mg /day/ week.

Iron sucrose was given in a dose of 200 mg intravenously in 100ml normalsaline over a period of 15-20 min on alternate days until the required total dose was administered; to the maximum dose of 600 mg/week.

Ganzoni formula:

Deficit = (Target hb{12gm/dl} -Hemoglobin of the patient) × 2.4 × Weight in kg (pre pregnancy) + 1000 (storage).

Follow up

They were followed up after three weeks, for haemoglobin estimation to note the rise in haemogloin values.

Results and Observations

Table 2

Distribution of patients according to the severity of anemia

Hb level

No. of cases

Percentage

Mild anemia

7

7.0

Moderate anemia

93

93.0

Total

100

100.0

Table 2 is showing 93% of patients were belongs to moderate anaemia.

Table 3

Correlation between age and severity of anemia

Age (years)

Moderate anemia

Mild anemia

No. of cases

Percentage

<20

3

-

3

3.0

20-24

52

7

59

59.0

25-29

26

1

27

27.0

30-34

11

-

11

11.0

Total

92

8

100

100.0

Table 3 is showing 59.0% of anemic patients were belongs to the age group of 2-24 years, in that 52.0% of cases were moderate anemia and 7.0% of were mild anemia.

Table 4

Correlation between socioeconomic status and severity of anemia

SES

Moderate anemia

Mild anemia

Total no cases

%

Upper middle class

39

4

43

43.0

Lower middle class

53

4

57

57.0

Total

92

8

100

100.0

Chi-Square Test & P-value

2 = 0.175,

P = 0.932,

NS

Table 4 is showing 43.0% of anemic patients were belongs to upper middle class and 57.0% of patients were belongs to the lower middle class, so according to our study anemia patients were more common in the lower middle class.

Table 5

Correlation between gravidity and severity of anemia

Gravidity

Moderate anemia

Mild anemia

No of cases

%

Primi

33

6

39

39.0%

multi

59

2

61

61.0%

Total

92

8

100

100.0

Chi-Square Test & P-value

2 = 4.73,

P = 0.039,

S

Table 5 is showing that anemia was more common in multigravida patients, that were 61.0% and 39.0% patients were primi gravida.

Table 6

Correlation between gestational age and severity of anemia

Gestational age in weeks

Moderate anemia

Mild anemia

No. of cases

%

15-21

20

-

20

20.0

22-28

56

7

63

63.0

29-35

16

1

17

17.0

Total

92

8

100

100.0

Table 6 shows that 63.0% of anemic patients were in the gestational age group of 22-28 weeks because of hemodiluation.

Table 7

Distribution of cases according to Hb level

Hb% level

FCM

Iron sucrose

Total

No.

%

No.

%

No.

%

Moderate 7--9

46

92.0

47

94.0

93

93.0

Mild 9--10

4

8.0

6.0

7

7.0

Total

50

100.0

50

100.0

100

100.0

Mean ± SD

8.28 ± 1.16

8.26 ± 1.13

8.27 ± 1.14

t-test value P-value

t = 0.023,   P = 0.962,   NS

[i] NS= Not significant, S= Significant, HS= Highly significant, VHS= Very highly significant

Study observed that, majority of the cases 93 (93.0%) were belongs to the moderate (7-9%) Hb% level and 7 (7.0%) were belongs to the mild Hb% level. There was no statistical significant difference of Hb% level between the groups FCM and Iron sucrose (P>0.05).

Table 8

Distribution of cases according to adverse effect

Adverse Effect

FCM

Iron sucrose

Total

No.

%

No.

%

No.

%

No Adverse effect

48

96.0

49

98.0

97

97.0

Rashes

1

2.0

1

2.0

2

2.0

Vomiting

1

2.0

0

0.0

1

1.0

Total

50

100.0

50

100.0

100

100.0

Chi-Square Test & P-value

2yates = 0.343,   P = 0.937,   NS

Study reveals that, there was no statistical significant difference of adverse effects between the groups of FCM and Iron Sucrose (P>0.05).

Figure 1

Multiple bar diagram represents Hb% level wise distribution of cases

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/f1cd8e6c-c2e1-45c4-8ff2-58b95f444065/image/6123a8b3-c81d-42db-a513-c27d1810717b-uimage.png

Table 9

Comparison of mean Hb% level before treatment and after 3 weeks treatment and also comparison between the groups

Groups

Before Treatment

After Treatment

Mean difference

Paired t-test P- value & Significance

Mean ± SD

Mean ± SD

FCM

8.28 ± 0.39

10.62 ± 0.66

2.34

t = 31.97 P = 0.000, VHS

Iron sucrose

8.26 ± 0.34

9.57 ± 0.46

1.32

t = 24.77 P = 0.000, VHS

Mean difference

0.02

1.05

--

--

Unpaired t-Test

t = 0.69

t = 9.155

---

----

P- value & Significance

P = 0.778 NS

P = 0.000 VHS

--

--

Study reveals that, there was statistically very highly significant difference of mean Hb% level before and after the treatment in FCM and Iron sucrose groups respectively (P<0.001).

After the treatment the mean HB% level has significantly increased in both the groups, therefore the treatment was effective in both the groups (P<0.001). But FCM group showed more increase the Hb% level as compare to Iron sucrose group.

Discussion

Nutritional anemia in pregnancy is a public health problem especially in developing countries and the commonest is iron deficiency anemia. Anemia in pregnancy is significantly associated with both fetal and maternal morbidity. Rapid improvement of Hb and iron stores in pregnancy will improve the general health status of the patient and decrease complications.

The patients in our study belonged to the age group of 18-35 years. The Majority of them were of the age group of 19-24 years in both study groups. The mean age was found to be slightly lesser in our study (24.8±4.4 and 24.5±3.1 years) when compared to other studies such as Christoph P et al.12 (29 and 29.9 years) and Patel J et al.,13 (29,1±2.4 and 28.4±3.7 yrs). This might suggest early marriage and pregnancy in patients in our study. Other maternal data such as Obstetric Index and gestational age though showed slight variations in either group were not significant as in other studies. Mean body weight (48.6 kg and 49.7 kg) was also significantly lower in our study as compared to prior studies (73.1 and 69.3 kg) by Christoph et al.,12 which suggests that patients in our study were poorly nourished.

Baseline Hb in our study was 7.8±1.2 g/dl in group 1 and 8.7±0.9g/dl in group 2, thus group 2 had anaemia to a slightly lesser degree. However, this did not account for bias as the patients received iron infusion depending on the dose calculated based on their respective Hb levels. The baseline Hb in other studies were slightly higher 9.7±0.9 and 9.5±4.9 g/dl in Christoph P et al., and 8.7±3.1 and 8.9±2.3 g/dl in Patel J et al.,.12, 13 This again suggests that our study population had slightly higher grades of anaemia and required more vigorous management. Serum ferritin levels were however comparable to other studies (12.8±29.1 mcg/L Christoph P et al.,) in group 1,11.2±7.9 mcg/L. Group 2 however owing to a lesser degree of anaemia had raised baseline serum ferritin levels (20.1±13.6 mcg/L versus 7±5.65 mcg/L in Christoph P et al.,).12 Other iron parameters such as serum iron and TIBC were also significantly better in group 2(57.4 mcg/dl and 357.1 mcg/dl respectively).

The mean iron required in group 1 of the present study was significantly higher than group 2 (978.1 versus 882.8 mg). Likewise, the total iron infused was also more in group 1(966.7 versus 743.3mg).

Christoph P et al.12 also showed similar differences in iron infused (933 versus 402 mg). Thus, our study population had iron deficiency and thus anaemia of higher severity.

In regards to the type of anaemia histologically, the majority of our patients had microcytic, hypochromic blood picture in both groups (65%) suggesting that majority had severe grades of iron deficiency.

The present comparative study investigated the efficacy and safety of FCM and iron sucrose in IDA of pregnancy. It was seen that both IV iron preparations were effective in treating IDA in pregnancy. FCM therapy efficiently increased Hb, at the end of 3 weeks following treatment. The Hb rise with FCM was 1.5±0.1g/dl at 3 weeks.

These results are in line with several other studies. A study by Christoph P et al.,12 on 206 pregnant women with IDA showed a Hb increase of 1.5±1.1g/dl at the end of 3 weeks. A similar study by Pels A et al., in the Netherlands showed Hb increase of 2.3 g% in 3 weeks. Patel J et al.,13 had Hb increase of 5.2 g/dl,15 days post treatment whereas the ferritin levels improved by 9.2 mcg/L.

Hb and ferritin values also improved after treatment with iron sucrose. Our study at the end of 3 weeks showed Hb increment of 0.7 -1.4 mg/dl. Christoph P et al.12 showed similar rise in Hb of 1.1g/dl in 4 weeks, whereas Patel J et al.,13 an Indian study, showed a rise of 3.7g/dl in 15 days. The ferritin increase in this previous Indian study was 9.2 mcg/L. Thus, in terms of efficiency, both FCM and iron sucrose showed improved results in our study as compared to several previous studies.

However, our study aimed to also compare the efficacy of FCM therapy to iron sucrose. At the end of 3 weeks, FCM showed significantly increased Hb and ferritin as compared to iron sucrose, post treatment.

Thus, our study shows, that FCM is well tolerated in pregnant women and has fewer number of side effects as compared to iron sucrose even when given as a large dose.

Conclusion

In conclusion, FCM not only offers a rapid correction of Hb levels but also provides replenishment of iron stores in the body, without major adverse effects. Thus, when used in pregnant women in their second or third trimesters the hazard of anaemia is not only tackled in pregnancy but might also be prevented in the post-partum period. At the end, we have a healthy mother with a healthy baby, which is a birth right of every woman. At the national level, this will tremendously reduce the burden of maternal morbidity and mortality and improve the quality of life. Hence, all the health care providers, hospital administration and the government should take measures to make FCM easily available and affordable to the women who are in actual need of it and make use of this boon to eradicate.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1 

R Garg A Nigam P Agrawal A Nigam R Agrawal Iron Carboxymaltose: A Safe and Effective Molecule to Combat Anemia in PregnancyInt J Curr Res Aca Rev20164212430

2 

S Ralston ID Penman MW Strachan RP Hobson R Britton S Davidson Davidson’s principles and practice of medicine23rd edElsevierEdinburgh2018

3 

K Park Park’s textbook of preventive and social medicine24th edBhanot PublishersIndia2017

4 

The work of WHO, 1980-1981: biennial report of the Director-General to the World Health Assembly and to the United NationsWorld Health Organizationhttps://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/204369(Accessed on 4th September 2018)

5 

Sixth report on the world health situation: part 1 global analysis, part 2, review by country and areaWorld Health OrganizationGenevahttp://www.who.int/iris/handle/10665/44199(Accessed on 4th September 2018)

6 

G Jain UA Palaria K Jhas Intravenous Iron in Postpartum AnemiaJ Obstet Gynecol India2013631458

7 

PS Kharde VB Bangal K Panicker Comparative study of intravenous iron sucrose versus oral iron therapy in iron deficiency anemia during postpartum periodInt J Biomed Adv Res20123423843

8 

LM Bodnar AM Siega-Riz WC Miller ME Cogswell T Mcdonald Who should be screened for postpartum anemia? An evaluation of current recommendationsAm J Epidemiol20021561090312

9 

National Family Health Survey-3. Prevalence of anemia in pregnancyhttp://rchiips.org/nfhs/report.shtml(Accessed on 19th November 2016)

10 

National Family Health Survey-4. Prevalence of anemia in pregnancyhttp://rchiips.org/nfhs/factsheet_nfhs-4html(Accessed on 19th November 2016)

11 

E Royston The prevalence of nutritional anaemia in women in developing countries: a critical review of available informationWorld Health Stat Q19823525291

12 

P Christoph C Schuller H Studer O Irion B Martinez D Tejada Intravenous Iron Treatment in Pregnancy: Comparison of High-Dose Ferric Carboxymaltose Vs. Iron SucroseJ Perinat Med201240546974

13 

J Patel K Patel J Patel A Sharma SK Date Comparison of intravenous iron sucrose and ferric carboxymaltose therapy in iron deficiency anemia in pregnancy and postpartum periodJ Pharm Sci Biosci Res20155323943

14 

D Agrawal DL Masand A study for efficacy and safety of ferric carboxymaltose versus iron sucrose in iron deficiency anemia among pregnant women in tertiary care hospitalContracept Obstet Gynecol20198622805

15 

A Pels W Ganzevoort Safety and Efficacy of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Anemic Pregnant Women: A Retrospective Case Control StudyObstet Gynecol Int2015201572895210.1155/2015/728952



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Article type

Original Article


Article page

180-184


Authors Details

Malgari Mounika, Ushadevi Gopalan*


Article History

Received : 24-01-2023

Accepted : 09-02-2023


Article Metrics


View Article As

 


Downlaod Files