Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research

Print ISSN: 2394-2746

Online ISSN: 2394-2754

CODEN : IJOGCS

Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research (IJOGR) open access, peer-reviewed quarterly journal publishing since 2014 and is published under auspices of the Innovative Education and Scientific Research Foundation (IESRF), aim to uplift researchers, scholars, academicians, and professionals in all academic and scientific disciplines. IESRF is dedicated to the transfer of technology and research by publishing scientific journals, research content, providing professional’s membership, and conducting conferences, seminars, and award more...

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article statistics

Viewed: 343

PDF Downloaded: 148


Get Permission Pais, Fernandes, and Rao: A case of missed mixed germ cell tumor of ovary in pregnancy


Introduction

Incidence of malignant adnexal masses during pregnancy is 1-8%.1 Ovarian germ cell tumor accounts for 18-26% of all ovarian cancers complicating pregnancy.2 Most common component of a mixed germ cell tumor is dysgerminoma followed by endodermal sinus tumor.3

We present a rare case of mixed germ cell tumor of ovary, misdiagnosed antenatally as uterine fibroid.

Case Report

Mrs. X, 34 year old primigravida at 37 weeks gestation presented with lower abdominal pain. Examination showed uterine contractions with breech presentation in labor. Early trimester scans were normal. Growth scan at 33 weeks of gestation showed fibroid in lower uterine segment, and posterior wall of cervix stretched over fibroid. Term obstetric scan at 37 weeks showed fibroid of 11x 9 cms in posterior wall of the lower uterine segment with central cystic area. She underwent an emergency LSCS in view of breech in labor and delivered a male baby weighing 2.005 kg. Intraoperatively on exteriorization of uterus, a 10 x 8 cm necrotic, non- encapsulated mass was seen posterior to uterus in rectovaginal space (as shown in Figure 1, Figure 2) and mass was sent for histopathology. Frozen section and staging laparotomy could not be done during caesarean section since it was an emergency LSCS done at midnight and diagnosis was not certain. Histopathology of the mass showed mixed germ cell tumor with 60% being yolk sac tumor component (Figure 3) and 40% being dysgerminoma (Figure 4). It was concluded as FIGO Stage IC1 ovarian carcinoma.

MRI done after 2 weeks showed a lesion of 10.4 x 9.5 x 7.3cm in rectovaginal pouch compressing and displacing the rectum posteriorly and to the left side, also displacing uterus and bladder anteriorly with left ovary normal and right ovary not being visualized. Chest MDCT revealed no metastasis. She received 4 cycles of chemotherapy comprising cisplatin and etoposide over 3 months. Serum AFP and Serum LDH levels were done monthly.(Table 1)

After completion of chemotherapy, PET scan was done which showed a lesion of 6.7x 6.2 x 4.2cm in the rectovaginal area just right to the midline with right ovary not being visualized separately. Hence, she underwent laparoscopic right oophorectomy with right external iliac lymphadenectomy. Histopathology showed extensive regressive changes with occasional scattered atypical cells with no conclusive evidence of residual tumor. Follow up serum LDH and AFP are within normal limits.

She is now on regular follow up with serum LDH and serum AFP once in 3 months to look for any recurrences.

Figure 1

Retroperitoneal mass during caesarean section

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/ad3816bd-3bab-4c96-91a2-93a7a8308580image1.jpeg

Figure 2

Intraoperative mass found behind the uterus during caesarean section

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/4feb599a-0fa6-4bdb-a4eb-3e90370057bb/image/0a496039-f3f8-4f23-bf62-f32e9392bf99-uuterus.jpg

Figure 3

Yolk sac component (Individual tumor cells are large, uniform, polygonal with distinct cell membranes and clear to eoisinophilic cytoplasm)

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/ad3816bd-3bab-4c96-91a2-93a7a8308580image3.png

Figure 4

Dysgerminoma component

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/4feb599a-0fa6-4bdb-a4eb-3e90370057bb/image/0e932e55-9d62-4889-bf29-354d23bd1f63-uimage.png

Table 1

Tumor marker levels

Tumor markers

Pre-chemotherapy

Post chemotherapy

LDH (U/L)

612

501

AFP (ng/ml)

2033

60.75

BETA HCG (mIU/ml)

0.994

CA125

Normal

Discussion

Most adnexal masses during pregnancy are detected in the first trimester by antenatal ultrasonography and resolve spontaneously. Careful evaluation of persisting adnexal masses is required to have definitive diagnosis.3

This is a rare case of mixed germ cell tumor of ovary, misdiagnosed antenatally as uterine fibroid.

Ultrasonography is the preferred imaging technique and MRI can be used for further evaluation.4

International ovarian tumor analysis (IOTA) simple rules can be used when malignancy is suspected in an adnexal mass in pregnancy.5

CA125 has limited utility during pregnancy as it rises in other benign conditions and is physiologically higher during the first trimester, but can be used as a baseline for follow up in suspected ovarian malignancy. AFP, Beta HCG and LDH are too normally elevated in pregnancy.6

Germ cell tumors are usually present at an early stage during pregnancy. Laparotomy is preferably planned for 2nd trimester beyond 14-16 weeks gestation. Unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and surgical limited staging is appropriate.3 If pelvic peritoneum and POD cannot be reliably examined during surgery because of enlarged uterus, restaging surgery should be planned post-partum.7

Studies have also found laparoscopy to be safer in management of adnexal mass during pregnancy.8, 9

Any adnexal mass during pregnancy even if found to be benign, should be further evaluated with MRI and tumor markers and monitored regularly to reduce the morbidity and mortality to the mother.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1 

A Sunder B Darwish A Darwish V Nagaraj NM Dayoub Adnexal Masses In Pregnancy: An overviewGinekologia i Położnictwo202217117

2 

M Kodama BH Grubbs EA Blake SS Cahoon R Murakami T Kimura Feto-maternal outcomes of pregnancy complicated by ovarian malignant germ cell tumor: a systematic review of literatureEur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol201418114556

3 

JA Berek Berek and Hacker’s. ‎ Wolters Kluwer HealthPhiladelphia(USA)2021

5 

R Auekitrungrueng D Tinnangwattana C Tantipalakorn C Charoenratana T Lerthiranwong C Wanapirak Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis simple rules and the risk of malignancy index to discriminate between benign and malignant adnexal massesInt J Gynaecol Obstet201914633649

6 

A Sarandakou E Protonotariou D Rizos Tumor markers in biological fluids associated with pregnancyCrit Rev Clin Lab Sci200744215178

7 

SI Ishioka T Hayashi T Endo T Baba H Honma T Saito Advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma during pregnancyInt J Clin Oncol20071253758

8 

RD Moore WG Smith Laparoscopic management of adnexal masses in pregnant womenJ Reprod Med199944297100

9 

L Chen J Ding K Hua Comparative analysis of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in the management of ovarian cyst during pregnancyJ Obstet Gynaecol Res20144037639



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Article type

Case Report


Article page

214-216


Authors Details

Janice A Pais*, Venita Roshal Fernandes, Sujaya V Rao


Article History

Received : 16-10-2022

Accepted : 21-12-2022


Article Metrics


View Article As

 


Downlaod Files