Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research

Print ISSN: 2394-2746

Online ISSN: 2394-2754

CODEN : IJOGCS

Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research (IJOGR) open access, peer-reviewed quarterly journal publishing since 2014 and is published under auspices of the Innovative Education and Scientific Research Foundation (IESRF), aim to uplift researchers, scholars, academicians, and professionals in all academic and scientific disciplines. IESRF is dedicated to the transfer of technology and research by publishing scientific journals, research content, providing professional’s membership, and conducting conferences, seminars, and award more...

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article statistics

Viewed: 422

PDF Downloaded: 202


Get Permission Thakur, Mohi, Pathak, and Garg: A comparative study on knowledge, awareness and perception of contraception among rural and urban population in Punjab


Introduction

According to the current estimated population, which is 1.37 billion, India stands as the second-most populous country worldwide. It is estimated that, in the middle of 2023, India’s population will increase by up to 8%, which is more than that of China’s population, and by the middle of 2050, this margin is expected to extend to 25%.1 Even though India implemented its first population control program in 1952, the baby boom is still challenging to overcome.2 This kind of uncontrolled population explosion will create a burden on natural resources, which are already in endangered condition. Therefore, the implementation of contraception becomes more necessary.

In this modern health era, where women have reached space on one side, they are still fighting for their rights, especially for their health, because every woman has the right to protect her own health. Hence, India was the first country to launch a national program for family planning.2 This program goes beyond simple birth control; it encompasses a comprehensive range of services, policies, information, attitudes, practices, and commodities.3 A variety of contraceptives are available to prevent unplanned pregnancies and provide an informed decision regarding whether and when to start a family for women, men, couples, and adolescents.4, 5 The success of contraceptives will not only improve the economic condition of the nation as a whole, but it will also improve the health of women and children in the family.6

In India, there are numerous methods of contraception, such as oral contraceptives (pills), intrauterine devices (IUDs), and condoms.4, 7 In addition to family planning, these contraceptives are also used to manage menstrual disorders, reduce the risk of ovarian and endometrial tumours, and treat the symptoms of polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS). Also, contraceptives help to reduce maternal, infant, and child mortality and morbidity around the globe and to prevent sexually transmitted diseases (STDs).4, 8, 9

According to various studies conducted in different parts of developing countries, knowledge of contraceptives is present, but the percentage of actual women using contraception is very low, and the method of contraception use also varies in different parts of Punjab. Numerous challenges interfere with the progress of developing countries, such as limited access to accurate information, insufficient supply sources, high costs, and cultural beliefs affecting the knowledge of contraceptive methods. These barriers pose significant challenges for development in the urban and rural regions of Punjab. Thus, the present study aims to understand knowledge, awareness, and perceptions related to contraception within the rural and urban populations of Punjab, shedding light on the nuanced dynamics of contraceptive perception in both settings.

Materials and Methods

This observational study was performed in a single centre on a section of the rural and urban population in Punjab over a period of 1 year, from July 2021 to July 2022. In the present study, approximately 492 participants of reproductive age between 18 to >36 years were included, and females outside this age group were excluded. Also, the study participants who were unwilling to participate were excluded from this study. Informed consent was obtained from all participants and ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Ethical Committee.

In this study, participants were asked a series of questions in a face-to-face interview using a pre-structured questionnaire in the local language. Considering the sensitivity of the topic and related social taboos, the investigating team provided specialized training to a local social worker. Through this training, the social worker was permitted to ask questions in an informal yet confidential setting, which encouraged study participants to open up comfortably and without any hesitation to share their responses.

The pre-design questionnaire was divided into two parts: the first part includes the demographic profile of the study participants, and the second part includes awareness regarding the use of contraceptives. Information about contraceptives includes knowledge, details of administration, availability, and side effects. Then, various perceptions, like fear and myths related to contraceptive use, were noted. Knowledge related to contraceptive effects on sexual behaviour, fertility in general, and basic awareness of contraceptive use was studied. Furthermore, people were encouraged to ask any doubts or queries and to get further awareness from the investigating team.

Statistical analysis

The patients' data, compiled in a master chart, was organized using Microsoft Excel software, and statistical analysis was conducted utilizing SPSS Windows, version 28. Descriptive analysis was carried out by generating frequency tables for categorical variables. To examine associations or compare proportions among selected variables, the chi-square test was utilized. Specifically, comparisons between patient symptoms of stroke and age groups were assessed using chi-square tests. Statistical significance was determined at a p-value of less than 0.05, indicating a significant result, while p-values greater than or equal to 0.05 were considered non-significant.

Results

In the present cross-sectional study, a total of 492 participants were included. The demographic profile of the included study participants revealed that, in terms of age distribution, the majority of the participants were found to be within the (26-36) age group (39.63%), closely followed by (18-26) (36.59%) and >36 (23.78%). Occupationally, a significant proportion were homemakers (77.85%), with a smaller segment engaged in private jobs (22.15%). Educational backgrounds highlighted a prevalence of primary education (55.69%), followed by higher secondary (29.07%), graduate (14.84%), and postgraduate (0.41%) qualifications. Regarding marriage duration, a noteworthy percentage had been married for less than 5 years (55.28%). The majority of participants were currently married (99.19%), while a small fraction reported divorce (0.20%) or widowhood (0.20%), as represented in Table 1.

Table 1

Socio-demographic details of study participant

Age

Rural

Urban

Total

Percentage

No of cases

No of cases

(18-26)

144

36

180

36.59%

(26-36)

157

38

195

39.63%

>36

86

31

117

23.78%

Total

387

69

492

100.00%

Occupation

Homemaker

311

72

383

77.85%

Private job

76

33

109

22.15%

Govt. job

0

0

0

0.00%

Total

387

105

492

100.00%

Education

Primary

235

39

274

55.69%

H. Secondary

109

34

143

29.07%

Graduate

41

32

73

14.84%

Post Grad

2

0

2

0.41%

Total

387

105

492

100.00%

Marriage Duration

<5 years

227

45

272

55.28%

>5 years

159

60

220

44.72%

Total

386

105

492

100.00%

Marital State

Married

385

103

488

99.19%

Unmarried

0

0

0

0.00%

In a relation

0

0

0

0.00%

Divorce

1

1

1

0.20%

Widow

0

1

1

0.20%

Total

385

105

490

99.59%

Table 2

Representing the awareness about contraception

Aware about contraception

Rural

Urban

Total

Percentage

Yes

387

105

492

100%

Source of information

Social circle

177

51

228

46.34%

Health Worker

72

11

83

16.87%

Media

126

41

167

33.94%

Educational institute

11

3

14

2.85%

Total

386

106

492

100.00%

Do you use contraception?

Yes

387

105

492

100%

Which contraception do you use?

Barrier

90

48

138

28.05%

OCP

92

18

110

22.36%

RHYTM

54

7

61

12.40%

IUCD

55

15

70

14.23%

Injection

12

1

13

2.64%

Withdrawal

88

16

104

21.14%

Implant

0

0

0.00%

Total

391

105

496

100.81%

Table 3

Comparative analysis of study participants in rural and urban area on the basis of their knowledge and awareness of contraception

Characteristics

Rural

Urban

Total

Percentage

Opt for TL

Yes

200

34

234

47.56%

No

187

71

258

52.44%

Total

387

105

492

100.00%

Vasectomy (Want your husband to undergo vasectomy)

Yes

77

33

110

22.36%

No

310

72

382

77.64%

Total

387

105

492

100.00%

HYSTERECTOMY (Do you think hysterectomy can be used as a method of contraception?)

Unsafe

292

60

352

71.54%

Weakness

14

13

27

5.49%

Don't know

81

78

112

22.76%

Total

387

151

492

100.00%

Known contraception (which barrier contraception do you know of?)

Male condom

387

105

492

100.00%

Female condom

1

0

1

0.20%

cervical cup

0

0

0

0.00%

What do you do if spillage of condom?

Take pill

217

73

290

58.94%

Do Nothing

170

32

202

41.06%

Total

387

105

492

100.00%

Do you side effect know?

Yes

130

59

189

38.41%

No

256

47

303

61.59%

Total

386

106

492

100.00%

Which side effect you know?

Rupture

17

6

23

4.67%

Slippage

41

39

80

16.26%

Allergy

70

15

85

17.28%

Total

128

60

188

38.21%

Would you use condom?

Yes

218

36

254

51.63%

No

167

69

236

47.97%

Total

385

105

490

99.59%

Characteristics

Rural

Urban

Total

Percentage

Name of OCP

Responses

Responses

mala n

323

89

412

83.74%

mala d

64

16

80

16.26%

Total

387

105

492

100.00%

Which IUCD you know?

CuT

387

105

492

100.00%

Multiload

3

0

3

0.61%

Would you go for this?

Yes

120

23

143

29.07%

No

267

82

349

70.93%

Total

387

105

492

100.00%

Given free by govt.?

yes

173

31

204

41.46%

No

214

74

288

58.54%

Total

387

105

492

100.00%

Do you know side effects?

Yes

134

45

179

36.38%

No

254

59

313

63.62%

Total

388

104

492

100.00%

Do you know about injectable?

Yes

8

6

14

2.85%

No

379

99

478

97.15%

Total

387

105

492

100.00%

Which injectable you know?

DMPA

8

6

14

2.85%

None

337

50

387

78.66%

NTEN

0

0

0.00%

Total

345

56

401

81.50%

Do you know about Implants?

Yes

0

0

0

0.00%

No

387

105

492

100.00%

Do you know about I pill?

Yes

259

55

314

63.82%

No

128

50

178

36.18%

Total

387

105

492

100.00%

Did you ever had unintended pregnancies?

Yes

72

34

106

21.54%

No

313

68

381

77.44%

Total

385

102

487

98.98%

Any prior MTP?

Yes

73

34

107

21.75%

No

316

69

385

78.25%

Total

389

103

492

100.00%

How did you deal with unintended pregnancies?

Medical Method

72

34

106

21.54%

Surgical Method

0

0

0

0.00%

The Table 2 revealed information on awareness, usage, and types of contraception among the participants. A total of 492 participants were included, and 100% reported being aware of contraception. In terms of the source of information, social circles were identified as the primary channel (46.34%), followed by the media (33.94%), health workers (16.87%), and educational institutes (2.85%). All participants reported using contraception. Concerning the types of contraception used, barrier methods were the most prevalent (28.05%), followed by oral contraceptive pills (OCP) (22.36%), rhythm method (12.40%), intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUCD) (14.23%), injection (2.64%), and withdrawal method (21.14%). Notably, no participants reported using implants.

The present study, provided valuable insights into the knowledge and awareness of contraception in both rural and urban areas. Nearly half of the participants opted for tubal ligation (TL) as a method of contraception (47.56%), with a significant proportion indicating awareness and preference for male condoms (100.00%). Concerning vasectomy, a substantial majority were not inclined towards it (77.64%) rest of the participants are reported in Table 3.

The current findings of the study, provide data on the basis of knowledge and awareness of contraception in both rural and urban areas. Participants demonstrated familiarity with oral contraceptive pills, with a significant majority recognizing Mala N (83.74%), while fewer were aware of Mala D (16.26%). CuT emerged as the primary known intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD) among respondents (100.00%), with minimal awareness of multiload (0.61%). A notable proportion indicated willingness to opt for IUCD (29.07%), although the majority were not inclined (70.93%). However, awareness of implants was negligible (0.00%). Emergency contraception (I pill) was well-known (63.82%). Some participants reported unintended pregnancies (21.54%), primarily managing them through medical methods (21.54%). No instances of the surgical method for unintended pregnancies were reported.

Discussion

In the present era, many women in the reproductive age group are aware of at least one contraception method, but their actual usage remains significantly low. Despite substantial efforts from both governmental and non-governmental organizations, we have not achieved any population control goals. The findings of the present study show that the total number of patients which was approximately, 492 from rural and urban areas, i.e., 387 and 105, respectively. The majority of the participants were in the 26–36 age group (39.63%), followed by the 18–26 age group (36.59%), and >36 (23.78%). These findings were in concordance with the study done by Upadhye JJ et al.10 They reported that, the maximum number of patients were between 26 to 30 years of age i.e., (43.5%) followed by (26.5%) who were between 22-25 years of age. Also, a study revealed by Ghike S, et al.11 reported that, most of the study participants (46.9%) were age between 22-25 years.

In the current investigation, 100% of the study participants demonstrated awareness of at least one form of contraception. However, the highest level of awareness was observed in rural areas, likely due to the larger number of study participants from this region compared to urban areas. In contrast, the National Family Health Survey conducted in 2015–2016 reported awareness of about 54.5% in Haryana.12 Similarly, another study conducted in an urban area reported that, 92.5% of women were aware of one or another method of contraception, but only 42.5% were aware of practicing contraception.10

Our study demonstrated that, approximately 85% of rural participants opted for condom usage, amounting to around 218 individuals, while 15% of participants were from urban areas, totalling 36 individuals. Whereas, the use of OCP noted among rural and urban populations was represented as follows:

In the rural population, 323 individuals (78.39%) used OCPs, with 64 (80%) using Mala-N and an equivalent percentage using Mala-D. Conversely, in the urban population, Mala-N was used by 89 individuals (21.60%), while Mala-D was used by 16 individuals (20%). In a similar way, other contraceptives such as barrier, OCP, RHYTM, IUCD, injections, and withdrawal were noted at 65.21%, 83.63%, 88.52%, 78.57%, 92.30%, and 84.61%, respectively, in rural areas. Whereas, in the Urban area, the percentage of use of the same contraceptives were noted at 34.78%, 16.36%, 11.47%, 21.42%, 7.69% and 15.38% respectively. These results were consistent with George S, et al.13 according to them, the condom was the most commonly used contraceptive found among 73.9% of cases, followed by oral pills (39.2%), and copper-T (23.9%).

In addition, extra findings showed that implants were not proffered by both study participants. This represents that knowledge and awareness of contraceptives were good in both regions of the study participants. This result contrasts with the observations of Nayak et al.4 and Young et al.,14 who reported percentages of 11% and 8%, respectively, among women who had never used contraceptives in their studies. Moreover, another study done by Sherpa et al.,15 where 38.23% of participants had never used contraceptives, as well as Renjhen et al.,16 who found a percentage of 44.6%, and Srivastava et al.,17 where never using contraceptives was found in 55%.

Conclusion

The present research underscores a profound understanding and favourable attitude towards contraception among rural and urban participants. Despite this, the practical implementation of contraceptive methods remains sub-optimal. Healthcare practitioners and social workers must emphasize key barriers, such as the prevalence of lacking contraceptive information among males compared to females, inadequate knowledge about contraception, and concerns regarding its side effects, which prevent widespread contraceptive usage. The present study reveals, contraceptive practices, condoms, oral pills, and intrauterine devices (IUDs) emerged as the cornerstone choices. However, their prevalence underscores the urgent need for comprehensive interventions to bridge the gap between knowledge and action, ensuring that individuals have uncontrolled access to effective family planning resources.

Limitations

  1. This study was carried out at a single centre, and one of its limitations was the restricted sample size.

  2. This study had limitations typical of cross-sectional studies. They can't track behaviours over time and the timing of data collection might not fully represent the community. Using interviews could introduce bias due to stigma, hesitation, or misunderstanding of questions. As a result, the reported knowledge, attitudes, and practices may not be accurate for the entire population.

  3. The majority of participants included from rural areas, with a notable disparity in representation from urban settings. This demographic difference could potentially introduce variability into the study's findings.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1 

S George H Kumar Knowledge Knowledge, attitude and practices of contraception among urban women in Mangaluru, KarnatakaInt J Community Med Public Health20196208690

2 

A Srivastava SM Khan RC Chauhan Knowledge, attitude and practices about contraception among married reproductive womenInt J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol201871431

3 

E Starbird M Norton R Marcus Investing in family planning: key to achieving the sustainable development goalsGlob Health Sci Pract201642191210

4 

AU Nayak KG Ramakrishnan KN Venkateswar M Vijayshree Assessing the knowledge, attitude and practice of contraception in rural India: a necessary step in achieving population controlInt J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol20176332831

5 

N Todd A Black Contraception for AdolescentsJ Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol20201212840

6 

H Saba K Kishore Assessment of knowledge about contraceptive methods among Bangalore Urban WomenMedPulse-Int Med J20141950813

7 

RA Harazi NM Alharbi AZ Ola R Alkhaldi I Almousa JN Almulhim Evaluation of current contraception methods and knowledge among females in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional surveyInt J Med Dev Count201931086772

8 

K Park Textbook of Social and Preventive Medicine23rd edBhanot PublishersJabalpur2017491

9 

PM Spritzer Contraception for Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Dealing with a Complex ConditionRev Bras Ginecol Obstet20224443256

10 

JJ Upadhye JV Upadhye Contraceptive awareness and practices in women of urban IndiaInt J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol201764127982

11 

S Ghike S Joshi A Bhalerao A Kawthalkar Awareness and Contraception Practices among Women—An Indian Rural ExperienceSouth Asian Fed Obstet Gynecol2010211921

12 

National Family Health Survey- 4, 2015-16https://rchiips.org/nfhs/pdf/NFHS4/HR_FactSheet.pdf

13 

S George H Kumar Knowledge, attitude and practices of contraception among urban women in Mangaluru, KarnatakaInt J Community Med Public Health20196208690

14 

LK Young CM Farquhar LM Mccowan HE Roberts J Taylor The contraceptive practice of women seeking termination of pregnancy in an Aukland clinicN Z Med J199410797818992

15 

SZ Sherpa M Sheilini A Nayak Knowledge, attitude, practice and preferences of contraceptive methods in Udupi district, KarnatakaJ Family Reprod Health20137311520

16 

P Renjhen GS Das B Ankur J Shipra K Binita A study of knowledge, attitude and practice of family planning among the women of reproductive age group in SikkimJ Obstet Gynecol India2008581637

17 

R Srivastava DK Srivastava R Jina K Srivastava N Sharma S Saha Contraceptive knowledge attitude and practice (KAP) surveyJ Obstet Gynecol India200555654650



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Article type

Original Article


Article page

191-197


Authors Details

Srishti Thakur*, Manjit Kaur Mohi, Nayana Pathak, Nitasha Garg


Article History

Received : 12-02-2024

Accepted : 02-03-2024


Article Metrics


View Article As

 


Downlaod Files