- Visibility 586 Views
- Downloads 568 Downloads
- Permissions
- DOI 10.18231/j.ijogr.v.12.i.3.5
-
CrossMark
Comprehensive review of robotic-assisted therapy for gynecological issues in patients with neurological disorders
- Author Details:
-
Mohammed Sheeba Kauser *
-
S Purna Chandra Shekhar
-
Sai Priyanka Nerusu
-
Khadijeh Menai
-
Sabah Thaver
-
Ali Irani
-
AL Prasanna Syamala
Mohammed Sheeba Kauser *
To assess the efficacy of robotic-assisted therapy in improving gynecological function and overall functional recovery in patients with neurological disorders. Robotic-assisted therapy (RAT) has emerged as a significant advancement in rehabilitative medicine, offering potential benefits for a variety of neurological disorders. This systematic review aims to evaluate the impact of RAT on functional recovery in gynecological issues associated with neurological disorders. A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library for studies published up to July 2024. Inclusion criteria comprised randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case studies that investigated the use of RAT in the management of gynecological issues in neurological patients. Data were extracted on study design, sample size, intervention details, and outcomes related to functional recovery and gynecological function. A total of 15 studies met the inclusion criteria, involving 600 patients with various neurological disorders including stroke, multiple sclerosis, and spinal cord injury. The majority of studies reported that RAT significantly improved gynecological function, as measured by specific scales and assessments. Improvements were observed in areas such as pelvic floor strength, urinary incontinence, and sexual function. Functional recovery was also enhanced, with better outcomes in motor skills, coordination, and overall quality of life. However, variability in intervention protocols and outcome measures was noted. Robotic-assisted therapy demonstrates promising potential in enhancing functional recovery and addressing gynecological issues in patients with neurological disorders. While the results are encouraging, there is a need for standardized protocols and larger, high-quality trials to validate these findings and refine therapeutic approaches.
References
- Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G. Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet. 2011;377(9778):1693–702.
- Hong KS, Bang OY, Kang DW, Yu KH, Bae HJ, Lee JS, et al. Stroke Statistics in Korea: Part I. Epidemiology and Risk Factors: A Report from the Korean Stroke Society and Clinical Research Center for Stroke. J Stroke. 2013;15(1):2–20.
- Barker-Collo S, Feigin VL, Parag V, Lawes CM, Senior H. Auckland Stroke Outcomes Study. Part 2: Cognition and functional outcomes 5 years poststroke. Neurology. 2010;75(18):1608–16.
- Rigby H, Gubitz G, Phillips S. A systematic review of caregiver burden following stroke. Int J Stroke. 2009;4(4):285–92.
- Pekna M, Pekny M, Nilsson M. Modulation of neural plasticity as a basis for stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 2012;43(10):2819–28.
- European Stroke Organisation (ESO) Executive Committee; ESO Writing Committee. Guidelines for management of ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack 2008. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2008;25(5):457–507.
- Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Twisk JW, Lankhorst GJ, Koetsier JC. Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral- artery stroke: a randomised trial. Lancet. 1999;354(1974):191–6.
- Esquenazi A, Packel A. Robotic-assisted gait training and restoration. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;91(11 Suppl 3):S217–27.
- Pignolo L. Robotics in neuro-rehabilitation. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41(12):955–60.
- Sivan M, O'Connor RJ, Makower S, Levesley M, Bhakta B. Systematic review of outcome measures used in the evaluation of robot-assisted upper limb exercise in stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2011;43(3):181–9.
- Stein J. Robotics in rehabilitation: technology as destiny. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;91(11 Suppl 3):S199–203.
- Lum PS, Godfrey SB, Brokaw EB, Holley RJ, Nichols D. Robotic approaches for rehabilitation of hand function after stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;91(11 Suppl 3):S242–54.
- Mehrholz J, Pohl M. Electromechanical-assisted gait training after stroke: a systematic review comparing end-effector and exoskeleton devices. J Rehabil Med. 2012;44(3):193–9.
- Dias D, Lains J, Pereira A, Nunes R, Caldas J, Amaral C, et al. Can we improve gait skills in chronic hemiplegics? A randomised control trial with gait trainer. Eura Medicophys. 2007;43(4):499–
- Morone G, Bragoni M, Iosa M, De Angelis D, Venturiero V, Coiro P, et al. Who may benefit from robotic-assisted gait training? A randomized clinical trial in patients with subacute stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011;25(7):636–44.
- Peurala SH, Airaksinen O, Huuskonen P, Jakala P, Juhakoski M, Sandell K, et al. Effects of intensive therapy using gait trainer or floor walking exercises early after stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41(3):166–73.
- Peurala SH, Tarkka IM, Pitkanen K, Sivenius J. The effectiveness of body weight-supported gait training and floor walking in patients with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(8):1557–64.
- Pohl M, Werner C, Holzgraefe M, Kroczek G, Mehrholz J, Wingendorf I, et al. Repetitive locomotor training and physiotherapy improve walking and basic activities of daily living after stroke: a single-blind, randomized multicentre trial (DEutsche GAngtrainerStudie, DEGAS). Clin Rehabil. 2007;21(1):17–27.
- Tong RK, Ng MF, Li LS. Effectiveness of gait training using an electromechanical gait trainer, with and without functional electric stimulation, in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(10):1298–304. Kauser et al. / Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research 2025;12(3):385–391 391
- Werner C, Von Frankenberg S, Treig T, Konrad M, Hesse S. Treadmill training with partial body weight support and an electromechanical gait trainer for restoration of gait in subacute stroke patients: a randomized crossover study. Stroke. 2002;33(12):2895–901.
- Chang WH, Kim MS, Huh JP, Lee PK, Kim YH. Effects of robot- assisted gait training on cardiopulmonary fitness in subacute stroke patients: a randomized controlled study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012;26(4):318–24.
- Hidler J, Nichols D, Pelliccio M, Brady K, Campbell DD, Kahn JH, et al. Multicenter randomized clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of the Lokomat in subacute stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23(1):5–13.
- Hornby TG, Campbell DD, Kahn JH, Demott T, Moore JL, Roth HR. Enhanced gait-related improvements after therapist- versus robotic-assisted locomotor training in subjects with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled study. Stroke. 2008;39(6):1786–92.
- Husemann B, Muller F, Krewer C, Heller S, Koenig E. Effects of locomotion training with assistance of a robot-driven gait orthosis in hemiparetic patients after stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. Stroke. 2007;38(2):349–54.
- Jung KH, Ha HG, Shin HJ, Ohn SH, Sung DH, Lee PKW, et al. Effects of Robot-assisted Gait Therapy on Locomotor Recovery in Stroke Patients. J Korean Acad Rehabil Med. 2008;32(3):258–66.
- Mayr A, Kofler M, Quirbach E, Matzak H, Frohlich K, Saltuari L. Prospective, blinded, randomized crossover study of gait rehabilitation in stroke patients using the Lokomat gait orthosis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007;21(4):307–14.